This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Nevada Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics   Interstate Highways   Locations   Nevada   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.   Nevada ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Should perhaps something be mentioned that because the southern section is now I-11, the highway is actually now a bypass and not a spur -- and in fact has the 'wrong' number as a consequence as well. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ ( talk) 01:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

No, since none of those statements are accurate. It still spurs off of I-15, but just happens to end (for now) at an interchange with other interstates. It's not a bypass, as there is no other logical direct freeway connection between its endpoints. And 515 still fits within the interstate numbering conventions. LJ  ↗ 15:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC) reply

There’s a report that highway officials identified the US 95 central corridor alternative as the preferred route for I-11 through the Las Vegas Valley. This affects I-515 because it is concurrent with US 95 for its entire length, and if it’s officially approved, then I-515 will mostly likely be replaced by I-11.

Should this be mentioned in the article? KevinML ( talk) 02:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply

It's probably fine to mention that NDOT has selected the I-515/US 95 alignment as the preferred alternative for I-11. If chosen, I-515 would likely be renumbered to I-11 (given the renumbering of I-515 south of I-215), but that tidbit may not be supported by references. -- LJ  ↗ 14:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply