This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
No one has voiced any opinions on this matter in seven months, so I'm going to go ahead move it. -
Uyvsdi (
talk) 19:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdireply
Kind of an issue, since right now and all research about the broader Eastern Woodlands group (which included both of Southeastern and Northeastern) redirect to the northeastern article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.21.135.18 (
talk) 19:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)reply
This article doesn't even mention "Northeastern Woodlands", so per the discussion above, I have moved it to "Eastern Woodlands".
Hoppingalong (
talk) 17:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Now, I see what's going on,
User:Hoppingalong made a unilateral move without consulting anyone. There is a comparatively well developed
Indigenous peoples of the Southeastern Woodlands. This article should be restored to what is was and the
Indigenous peoples of the Eastern Woodlands should be a disambiguation page with an additional link to
Classification of indigenous peoples of the Americas. I can't move it myself and don't want to do a cut-and-paste move. We are slowly trying to develop broad articles for all cultural regions in the Americas; however, "Eastern Woodlands" is typically divided into North and South due to the large area and number of tribes covered.-
Uyvsdi (
talk) 19:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Uyvsdireply
Not exactly. See section below. This previously was the target of all Eastern Woodland redirect and only mentioned the larger group and then had a list of the northern part of the group. I thought the most straightforward way would be to move this to the broader title, then cut the list into a new article on NE Woodlands. Either way, three articles, with the top level being Eastern Woodlands (it should be a full article, not a disambiguation), and the next level being North- and Southeastern Woodlands gets the structure right. The move below would do this (albeit in a more roundabout way than I was thinking of).
Hoppingalong (
talk) 20:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)reply
this is amazing oh and im 9 years old im a 4th grader right now im in soshuls studdeis and we are acsaly learning about the tribs my name is Aubrianna i was born in 2014.
164.83.64.240 (
talk) 19:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --
BDD (
talk) 19:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Agree Until today the article, other than the list focused entirely on the Eastern Woodlands, a broader group. All of the Eastern Woodlands redirects pointed here, which was wrong. There is now a general stub
Indigenous peoples of the Eastern Woodlands that in time can be a full article covering the broader group which has many books written on it, and two subregional articles that should be titled
Indigenous peoples of the Southeastern Woodlands (as already is) and
Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands (now a redirect here, but would contain this article after this move). That seems to make the most sense.
Hoppingalong (
talk) 20:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Support: A simple fix of terminology. "Northeastern Woodlands" is proper terminology and used across multiple sources, including most US History high school and college textbooks. People of the Southeast are quite culturally distinct in many ways, hence "Eastern woodlands" is a bit overbroad.
Montanabw(talk) 00:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Support - This doesn't seem controversial, can it not just be speedy?
Til Eulenspiegel /
talk/ 13:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
eastern subarctic forests
what do the eastern subarctic forests people eat please tell me food,dear,rats,mice, and other things — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
198.111.71.24 (
talk) 14:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)reply