This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Illinois Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:

(1) Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or

(2) Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.

The following table shows when population data is available:

Please contact me if you have any questions. Yours aye,  Buaidh  22:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Illinois statistical areas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421034031/http://www.beliefnet.com/politics/religiousaffiliation.html to http://www.census.gov/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100320084325/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/ to http://2010.census.gov/2010census/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Illinois statistical areas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141218204847/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/index.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC) reply

I am not used to editing tables like this, so I wanted to post this change here first and make sure it's accurate - and that I'm not misunderstanding the layout of the table.

The table lists the Core Based Statistical Area of the Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL MSA as not being part of a Combined Statistical Area. At least that's how I read the table, and the placement of "none" in the first column of that row. Except, it is part of a CSA... Davenport–Moline–Clinton,_Muscatine,_Iowa–Illinois_Combined_Statistical_Area So I would assume the table needs to be corrected to reflect this, and link to that page.

But also, if the data on this table ( The 171 Combined Statistical Areas of the United States of America) is up-to-date (and I assume it's automated in some fashion), the current population for the Quad Cities-based CSA at the last census was 471,551, with a 2017 estimate of 472,153. Which would mean that it's above both Rockford-Freeport-Rochelle, IL CSA and Peoria-Canton, IL CSA, as the 3rd largest CSA in IL. In fact the population numbers on this page look outdated, because they don't match what is on the other table for any of those three CSAs. But even the newer numbers put the population of the Quad Cities CSA as higher than that of the CSAs of Rockford or Peoria.

And I assume that part of the population of the Quad Cities based CSA being in Iowa has no relevance to this chart's organization, since the St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL CSA is also partly populated with people from Missouri.

So could someone more knowledgeable than me on wikistats pages, please let me know if I'm correctly understanding the information presented in this charge, and therefore my corrections are appropriate to make? Thanks. CleverTitania ( talk) 02:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I just realized that both tables, in their coding, say they're Census data and not to edit that data. But the national CSA list says it's batch uploaded from changes made at the Census bureau, where as this table does not. Can we simply update this table to pull the same data that the other table is pulling? Or should we simply use the data from the same source page and update this chart manually, as well as the sources linked? CleverTitania ( talk) 02:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC) reply