This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christina Aguilera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christina Aguilera on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christina AguileraWikipedia:WikiProject Christina AguileraTemplate:WikiProject Christina AguileraChristina Aguilera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I think the redirection could be removed since it contains sufficient and reliable sources and is within the rules established by
Wikipedia. It's the same situation
Slow Down Baby.
*Fr@Πkl!nG* (
talk) 00:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Per
WP:NSONGS and the consensus which was established
[1] the song is not notable. Per
WP:OTHERSTUFF using other things as an example isn't the best way to proceed an argument. Until the situation changes to form a new consensus the redirect will remain in place. A song with no charts and little coverage is not notable. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 |talk2me 00:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I have proof this is a single in Australia. It is a digital only track and I can provide the itunes link and everything. It charted on the airplay chart, I can provide web links to prove it was released here from the Aussie labels website. Release history, Airplay chart peak, track listing, cover art if the track was to be un-redirected.
User talk: Bill4kate
That's not the issue.... you appear not to have understood what makes a song notable. A song has to have coverage from 3rd party
reliable sources and it needs to have charted. Just because a single was released, it doesn't automatically inherit or hvae a right to its own article. it would help if people actually read WP:NSONGS. --
Lil_℧niquℇ №1[talk] 21:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Then why isn't it stated it was a single in the singles seciton of Bionic. Surely the fact it was clearly released here means it should get a mention. (
Billy4kate (
talk) 21:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC))reply
Bring that up at the album's page and/or be
WP:BOLD and add it with your source(s). What sources do you have btw? --
Lil_℧niquℇ №1[talk] 21:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The itunes Australia link to the digital singles page[1]. Christinas official website stating her "hot new single i hate boys has just been released to radio"[2]. Various other online digital outlets with the 2-track release. Radio station articles. (
Billy4kate (
talk) 21:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC))reply
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
who also handled the production of the song. It is a pop song--> REpetition of song, try "who also handled the production of the track. "I Hate Boys" is a pop song"
Done
but it contains hate-driven song about ridiculing men.--> Doesn't make sense, what were you trying to say here?
Done
It was serviced to Australian radio on June 28, 2010 --> add a comma after 2010
Done
The song received mixed to favorable reviews from music critics; some critics --> The song received mixed to favorable response from music critics; some reviewers
Done
the gang chants --> needs an expansion or wikilink
In the source given it says "gang chants". I think it's a group of people chant together. —
Trnhgduoc2222 (
talk) 11:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Background
Initially "I Hate Boys" was supposed to be produced by Le Tigre.[1] Le Tigre’s Johanna Fateman wrote about working with Aguilera on the Le Tigre website --> Initially "I Hate Boys" was supposed to be produced by American electroclash band, Le Tigre.[1] Group member Johanna Fateman wrote about working with Aguilera on their official website
Done
There's nothing about the inspiration of the track?
Nope, I can't find the suitable resources.
Composition
It contains a --> "I hate boys" contains a
Done
gang chant --> Explain or expand
Lyrically, it comes off like --> This seems like your opinion, and needs an author to balance it out, like "ACcording to Idolator's XXXX, lyrically "I Hate Boys"... " You have done it in the later prose, but it is mainly needed here
Done
I Kissed A Girl --> I Kissed a Girl
Done
Reception
'I Hate Boys' is a Christina track we totally back - and, --> Use en-dash here
Done
Again, I hate it when the critical response section becomes a QUOTEFARM. Please rephrase at least 50% of these quotes in your own prose.
Done
Other
Use en-dash in tracklisting and credits
Done
ADd the sales of the track in the charts section.
In the source given there are no information about the sales.
On hold for changes. Short and concise article. —
Indian:BIO · [
ChitChat ] 06:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)reply
I made the
WP:ACCESS changes for you and it seems the Gaon company stopped publishing the sales of the songs, except for the current version. Passed it nevertheless. —
Indian:BIO · [
ChitChat ] 02:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
I Hate Boys. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.