This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
The first sentence states what this article is about. It is not about ethnic Hungarians. It is about people (or their descendents) who came from the country of Hungary. The fact the geographic scope of Hungary has changed over time is of no consequence whatsoever. If they came from a place that was part of Hungary at the time, then they are are of Hungarian descent. This is the same for all fooian American articles, reflects the terminology used in the US, and is not to be changed by a single editor who wants to impose his agenda on this article or any other article.
Hmains (
talk) 04:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)reply
However, this article isn't
People of Hungarian descent. It's Hungarian Americans. We've been through this many times over the years. Just because you seem to be one of the few (possibly only) editor who doesn't know that's the way to source X-American lists, isn't really my problem.
Bulldog123 11:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)reply
This article is about Americans and their desscendents who came from the country of Hungary. As you state, you are trying to change this article into one involving just ethnic Hungarians. You have not discussed this change here on the talk page and have not obtained consensus from anyone for such radical changes.
Hmains (
talk) 18:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)reply
As you state, you are trying to change this article into one involving just ethnic Hungarians
No, I'm not. I'm trying to change (if you can call it that - considering it shouldn't have been the other way around at all per
WP:OR) this article to include only people who have been referred to by professional sources as "Hungarian American." It just so happens... in most case... they are ethnic Hungarians. Though that's not always true as
Edward Teller, an ethnic Jew, is still referred to as Hungarian American... most likely because he grew up in a Magyarized family... therefore he remains.
Bulldog123 15:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)reply
What you do is change: writing was one way; you are reversing it. The long standing writing of an article is arrived at by consensus of the WP editors. WP is about consensus. The result of that consensus is what is in any given article at any given time. When editors want to change something, they must gather consensus to do so. Otherwise, they have no right to change anything and in particular to re-purpose an article just because they do not like the current (and long-standing) consensus. You edits are trying to re-purpose the article as you have stated above and change the inclusion criteria to match what you want to now assert. I suggested alternatives on your talk page regarding ethnic articles. I see you have not pursued them. Do you want to contribute your ideas to WP or do you just want to fight, which is to no one's benefit?
Hmains (
talk) 19:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I'll put it in the easiest terms possible: I don't need anyone's "consensus" to remove a
smurf from a
List of Hungarians. If, however, you find a source calling that smurf "Hungarian" ...there's nothing I can do but allow you to re-add that smurf. Then you can call me a vandal. Let's say that smurf is
Joseph M. Gaydos. I removed him (perfectly in my right if he's unsourced or sourced improperly). Now it's your job to prove that I was wrong to remove him:
[1]. If I am wrong, then you can call me a
vandal. Unfortunately, it seems I wasn't wrong. Clear enough?
Bulldog123 08:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)reply
well there seem to be an inconsistency on many of en.wiki's
Hyphenated-American sites about the question of inclusion of Jews on those pages - and maybe there is not a clear simple easy answer on that question
78.42.252.102 (
talk) 19:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)reply
File:Frank Darabont 1.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
I have just modified one external link on
Hungarian Americans. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Hungarian Americans. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.