This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Houston Dynamo FC article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
I moved all the stuff to this page and added a redirect, someone more knowledgable please finish the job. Thanks. BobbyAFC
Wow, that was fast! Jhbutcher 16:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
There's quite a bit of information regarding the team name and the controversy surrounding the naming decision(s). While this is good, useful information, I think that it's much less significant than the achievements and history of the team on the field. I'd suggest either moving the naming history down lower in the article or, better yet, creating a new article on the history and controversy surrounding the team name and provide a link to that article from this article. Any comments before I proceed in doing so? Michael McFarlane 21:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I totally disagree. This information may not be important to you, but to many hispanics that call houston home, it is very important. The problem you have is that you are embaressed by this organization's stupid choice of name, which was insulting to hispanics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.53.96.173 ( talk) 05:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The section on the controversy is highly biased. The information is useful, but it needs to be presented in a better way. Niasain ( talk) 18:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
This section states that fan surveys haven't been allowed to name expansion teams since Houston, but Sounders fans voted on the naming on the team, and in fact the name Sounders was a write in, as it was not one of the three on the ballot. CarlosTakeshi ( talk) 00:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Why was the part regarding the logo/name leaked? i can see taking off the "spoiler" section, but the leak was certianly a major incident in the young club's history? SteelyDave 20:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
All other MLS team pages use regular dashes in the team info box and in player, coaches area. If you switch this page to use mdash and ndash, please be consistent and change all other MLS pages as well. DR31 ( talk) 13:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
The two recent additions under "History" and "Stadiums" both seem to be too long-winded and irrelevant for this article in that they really belong to other articles (esp. the Robertson Stadium ones. I think both sections should be taken out but don't want to do so unilaterally ... opinions? Jyardley 21:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
It's true that the Dynamo sporting society was not only "sometimes supported by the KGB" - as anonymous users keep adding to the article - but indeed sponsored by various political-police organizations, including those preceding the KGB, and initially created as their sporting arm. However, I'm thinking that it's fairly tangential to the Houston Dynamo article, and that people can find out that info, if they care, by clicking on the link I put in there. I don't think we need to go into the secret-police association of the name in this article, especially since it was never intentional. Bill Oaf 04:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
See Talk:Major League Soccer#Player identification help. Thanks! howcheng { chat} 00:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Are the Dynamo happy with having home games in Robertson Stadium, or are they looking to build a new home?-- BigMac1212 03:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Due to the recent developments Letter of intent signed, should a new section involving the possible location be mentioned?-- Hourick ( talk) 19:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
There is a list towards the bottom titled, "Notable Players", but what exactly defines a notable player in this article? Tennis DyNamiTe 21:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know who 204.63.34.15 is? He/she keeps changing this page to indicate that Enrique Perez, not Taylor Twellman, scored against the Dynamo in MLS Cup 2006. If someone knows how to properly report these incidents, please do so. Michael McFarlane 00:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:ChicagoFire.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:LAgalaxy.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Chivas WERE NOT the western conference champs. The article was incorrect, and the people who run MLS's web site took it down as soon as they were notified of the error. This is not hard to understand. The ONLY team that gets to claim a conference championship is the team that wins the playoff game and receives the trophy. Call the league and ask them. As far as the Dynamo claiming the conference title as a team honor, they are totally within their rights to do so, and anyone who wants to add it to their list of honors on this page would be correct in doing so. The Dynamo were Western Conference champions in 2006 and 2007. There IS NO champion yet for 2008. It will be decided in the conference final the weekend of Nov. 15-16. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.77.85.254 ( talk) 17:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't get this part. Why is it the Dynamo having Western Conference Champs shirts/hats etc...as well as the trophy but don't get to claim it as a team honor. Please someone explain this to me, I believe the MLS needs to do something about it, its a bit confusing. . —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tankfantry (
talk •
contribs) 03:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Should we go back to the regular MLS infobox template that uses the Football Kit template instead of the alt infobox template that uses a graphic? I know everybody's making a big deal about the use of non-free images in Wikipedia. I didn't want to make the change without getting a consensus first. -- Kitch ( Talk : Contrib) 13:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Couldn't we change the crests section to something less redundant? I know we would like to show off the MLS cup successes of the Dynamo to the rest of the world, but the crest by itself hasn't changed since the original 1836 logo. It looks like we're trying too hard and in any of the other football clubs' pages, they don't change the crest picture due to the team winning a new championship. I'd change it myself, but I thought I'd get some input on this first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surelyitsjohn ( talk • contribs) 03:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I completely agree with you. I would like to see someone add the fact that while we may have never won to West out right we do have two sets of hardware (western conference trophy). —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
76.30.15.250 (
talk) 04:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Does the Carolina Challenge cup really belong in this section? It's a preseason tournament and I don't believe winning it is necessarily the number one priority for most of the competitors, Dynamo included. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.92.226 ( talk) 07:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed the preseason friendly loss to Gamba Osaka was changed by anonymous IP to the team's worst defeat (in the infobox). Despite the fact the tournament is named the Pan-Pacific Championship, it was still a friendly and I'm not sure it should be considered the team's worst defeat. Of course the previous was listed as the 5-2 loss in a friendly Houston played at CF Pachuca last April. Is that section not for the team's worst defeat in league or cup games? I don't really care but just wondering because if we have to keep up with friendy wins/losses it just seems a bit rediculous. Again, this is just my opinion which is why I didnt change until there is some sort of consensus. -- otduff t/ c 17:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I cleaned up the site as some things were put haphazardly and took up a lot of space for a general article on the Dynamo (the site itself was 31 kb big and things weren't this confusing on the other club sites). I created a couple of side articles to facilitate the cleanup. I kept the crest logo history on despite my irritation on the idea in general (are we really going to add a new logo to the main site every time we win a MLS cup?). Since it's Wikipedia, I invite any changes to the article, even going as far as fixing what I changed. I love that we have the most informative club site out of the other MLS clubs, but I just thought things needed to be presented better.
Surelyitsjohn ( talk) 02:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I've started an article for the Dynamo's 2009 season. I don't follow the Dynamo and noticed that editors here were able to maintain a season article up through the 2008 season, so hopefully someone from here will be able to maintain the 2009 season article. I'll try and keep the schedule information updated, but team news and trades will probably not be on my list of things to maintain. -- Bobblehead (rants) 21:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Images from the game against Colorado are now on commons at commons:Category:Houston Dynamo v Colorado Rapids 2009. Nanonic ( talk) 11:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I remember hearing a commentator describing Dynamo fans traveling to other venues is what should be happening in MLS because that's what happens in Europe. Could a section be created for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treyvo ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:New York Red Bulls#conference champions
just adding a link to a centralized discussion on division champions conventions. Please post comments there.
Nlsanand ( talk) 04:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
both the Houston Dynamo and San Jose Earthquake posting are wrong!!! The Dynamo is not an expansion team, while Earthquake were on hiatus. AEG move the team to Houston and the "new" Earthquake were an expansion team, with a new owner. MLS refered to the team moving, not "some of the players and staff" as the article claims, but "ALL PLAYERS AND COACHES". The AEG owned "earthquake/dynamo" franchise has four MLS titles, and the "present SJ team - NONE" Ask where are the trophies? In Houston!
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=352315&cc=5901 http://www.soccertimes.com/mls/2005/dec16.htm
"MLS commissioner Don Garber said San Jose could obtain an expansion team as early as 2007, though AEG's failure to find a local investor and inability to put together a stadium deal before finally deciding to move might cast doubt on that prospect.
In the meantime, Leiweke emphasized at today's press conference that Houston would not go through the growing pains usually associated with expansion. All San Jose player and coaches contracts have been transferred to Houston.
San Jose won the MLS Cup title in 2001 and 2003 and captured the 2005 MLS Supporters Shield for the league's best record of 18-4-10 (64 points).
"This is not an expansion franchise," Leiweke said. "This is one of the best teams in the MLS. You're getting an extraordinary franchise"
I am guessing the person that controls these pages is from San Jose, and wants to think "their" team won something in the past. Untrue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetinhouston ( talk • contribs) 06:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Does anyone have a picture of El Capitán? I think an image of the cannon would really raise the value of this article and the Texas Derby article. -- Blackbox77 ( talk) 18:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
I went ahead and added a photo of El Capitán to both the Texas Derby page and the main Dynamo wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imapuppy ( talk • contribs) 17:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from editing changes I've already made. I'm changing it for the new year and new stadium. I will be combining the sections from [2005 till 2011] to make [Robertson Era]. The changes will start Monday (10/24) and shouldn't take too long. Treyvo ( talk) 05:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
There was a discussion about the new roster format and we have had a trial at both the Timbers and Whitecaps articles and recently Cascadia Cup rival Sounders have converted. The idea is to move all club articles on Wikipedia to the new format as is discussed in the original discussion and more recently at the football project.
My suggestion is to complete the MLS team articles first, so if you could respond at this discussion, that would be ideal. In short, the new layout is slightly taller and less wide, but it correctly impliments WP:MOSFLAG and is better for visually impared users of Wikipedia and others who use readers. I plan to implement the change to this article by the weekend of January 20-22, however other editors could make the change sooner. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
He is no longer a DP as of the new season. It was only his transfer fee that made him qualify as a Designated Player.
Deleting Active Teams box, following the seemingly end of discussion on Talk:Sporting Kansas City/Archive 1#Infobox. If you have objections, please take it up there, so as to keep everything in one place. Elisfkc ( talk) 22:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
It's not you're call. Why does that bother you so much anyway? Bluhaze777 ( talk) 00:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Should the recent major expansion, which looked pretty good, be reduced and the entire history moved to a history sub-article? Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Houston Dynamo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://houston.mlsnet.com/news/team_news.jsp?ymd=20070722&content_id=107324&vkey=news_hou&fext=.jsp&team=t200When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
I feel that FC should not be included above the logo on the right, in the "Infobox football club" "club name" line. Many pages for big clubs around the world do not include the FC in that spot, be it Liverpool, Bayern, Barcelona, Man City, Valencia, Arsenal, Leicester, Celtic, Rangers, Porto, and many others. HTownDynamoFan ( talk) 22:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)