 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Harlem River article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The contents of the Sherman Creek (New York) page were merged into Harlem River. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Where do the B, D, 4, 5, and 6 trains cross the river? They aren't listed here. Digamma 20:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Listed. Epicgenius ( talk) 19:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Does the Harlem River actually FLOW? If so, which way? The text makes it sound like it goes from the East TO the Hudson, but that seems unlikely. If anything, wouldn't it carry a little bit of the Hudson's volume eastward? In any event, please clarify. Spark240 ( talk) 21:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- It says "tidal" thus both ways. Do we need a link that will explain that word? Jim.henderson ( talk) 20:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- The Harlem River goes either way, depending on the tides. But yes, I consider this to be quite an oddity that this "river" flows both ways, hence some explanation would be good. The picture at the straits article is quite self-explanatory. But why are the levels of the two connecting waters different depending on the tides? The ocean is so close! So instead of just a link, it could be nice to explain the tidal levels for this particular case.
129.236.254.108 (
talk) 13:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, yes, it's part of the tidal system of New York Harbor, which article doesn't even mention the word "tide". And this system is one of the more complex among world harbors, approximatly as complex as those of San Francisco or Basra or Calcutta. I, alas, lack the expertise to do more than vaguely appreciate the complexity. Jim.henderson ( talk) 03:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
The image/map on this page cannot be understood by the one in twelve white males who suffer from red-green color blindness. Please can someone with color sight update this image so I can see it? Perhaps a map/drawing might be easier to distinguish than a satellite photo. Thanks. Andrew Oakley ( talk) 11:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I guess I have Deuteranopia and cannot see the Harlem River! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.45.126 ( talk) 02:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Harlem River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018193251/http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/sherman_creek/index.shtml to http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/sherman_creek/index.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090708164632/http://www.washington-heights.us/history/archives/johnson_ironworks_factory_126.html to http://www.washington-heights.us/history/archives/johnson_ironworks_factory_126.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gsapp.org/Archive/HP/2003-2004/history.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://eastrivercrew.org/HistoryRowing-RowingInNYC-A_Lost_LegacyArticle2012.05.30.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218201354/http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/sherman_creek/booklet.pdf to http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/sherman_creek/booklet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Harlem River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170909052746/https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170804/inwood/sherman-creek-nyrp to https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170804/inwood/sherman-creek-nyrp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502001025/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20110516/harlem/local-artists-kids-design-banners-plaques-for-harlem-river-park to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20110516/harlem/local-artists-kids-design-banners-plaques-for-harlem-river-park
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Most of this article was created with this cut-and-paste edit in 2010: https://en.wikipedia.org/?diff=374372566 Even if Dhollm ( talk · contribs) were to obtain a copyright release (which they did not), the reliability of the source is unclear. That the writing was lifted from somewhere was abundantly obvious; it is surprising it remained undetected for over nine years. It is my understanding that an admin will have to scrub the history because of the extensive interim edits. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Took some digging to confirm, because the source site (
http://ccgsapp.org/Archive/HP/2003-2004/history.html) doesn't exist any more, but yes this was copied and pasted directly and then tinkered with, but the majority of content was completely unchanged (just wikified) even now. Revisions all deleted.
Fish+
Karate 11:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- @ Fish and karate and SandyGeorgia: Just noticed this today. While I agree that the copyright violations are problematic, almost all of the non-copyright-violating sections of this page have been deleted, including those that I had to retrieve from a 2010 version of this article. Not that I care too much, but I just wanted to note that the pre-2010 text has been re-added. I will begin working on adding non-copyrighted information to this page. epicgenius ( talk) 17:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)