From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge to Object hyperlinking

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
After over three years, there does not appear to be consensus to merge these two articles. Not done. WTF? ( talk) 13:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I think Hardlink (homonymy) should be merged into Object hyperlinking. It appears these articles are about the same thing, or at least, things so nearly to being the same thing that it makes sense to treat them together. Objections? Better ideas? — DragonHawk ( talk| hist) 13:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Makes sense to me. I work with this type of technology. 4 October 2009. (jb) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.24.243 ( talk) 03:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Weasel reference? Nearly the same is not the very same. Merging object links and meta-object links (hardlinks) to one lemma appears like cross breeding apples and pears. Who will save what on merging? Skip it. Wireless friend ( talk) 14:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.