This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
After over three years, there does not appear to be consensus to merge these two articles. Not done.
WTF? (
talk) 13:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)reply
I think
Hardlink (homonymy) should be merged into
Object hyperlinking. It appears these articles are about the same thing, or at least, things so nearly to being the same thing that it makes sense to treat them together. Objections? Better ideas? —
DragonHawk (
talk|
hist) 13:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Makes sense to me. I work with this type of technology. 4 October 2009. (jb) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.98.24.243 (
talk) 03:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Weasel reference? Nearly the same is not the very same. Merging object links and meta-object links (hardlinks) to one lemma appears like cross breeding apples and pears. Who will save what on merging? Skip it.
Wireless friend (
talk) 14:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.