This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Technically speaking, no reason was ever brought up to move the page, and the request was objected to on the grounds of lacking a reason, so no particular action is endorsed or precluded.
Harej (
talk) 15:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Tentative oppose. You haven't given any actual reason for the move here,
Mark Schierbecker, other than that it was turned down as a speedy. Note that per
WP:OFFICIALNAME it isn't sufficient just to show that they call themselves "HandsOn" (with no space), you'd have to show its usage in reliable sources too. Two of those in the article's references,
[1] and
[2] appear to show it with a space. If you can show that it is
WP:COMMONNAME to spell it without a space, then I could support. —
Amakuru (
talk) 11:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: Tempted to close as not moved, no rationale, no support, but as nom has only just been notified of possible support suggest we leave this in the backlog for say two more days to give a chance to respond, and close as not moved on 23/04/2015 if there is no further action, rather than relist now and then wait another full discussion period.
Andrewa (
talk) 15:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Two sources I checked, NYT and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, both use HandsOn exclusively:
[3][4][5][6][7][8]. Also this recent article:
[9]Mark Schierbecker (
talk) 21:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.