This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Hi! I have elected to review this article against the
Good article criteria, and should have my initial comments posted up shortly. Cheers,
Abraham, B.S. (
talk) 05:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I have now completed a review of the article, and am placing it on hold pending a few issues outlined below. However, I am confident that these should not take too much effort to remedy. Well done so far. :) Cheers,
Abraham, B.S. (
talk) 06:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Is there a particular reason why the metacentric height of the ships is in inches (imperial), while the rest of the article uses metric measurements?
Yeah, presumably I was reading directly from the USN source and forgot to switch it :)
"Habsburg and Árpád took part in their first fleet maneuvers in the summer of 1903." - Summer can be a little ambigious, due to the southern and northern hemispheres subject to this season at different times, so it may be best to clarify exactly when. Bit of the same issue with "At the outbreak of World War I in the summer of 1914".
Google Books isn't letting me see the page for the first instance, so I just changed it to "mid 1903." As for the second, I changed that to "late July 1914."
Is there any informations on the planning/conception for the class or its design?
Nothing I've come across. Conway's 1860-1905 isn't nearly as good with that as the later volumes (which I guess is understandable, it was the first attempt, and of course it's going to be harder to find stuff on 100+ year old ships than it is on much newer vessels).
Is there any further information on the ships' service during the First World War? It just seems a little abrupt as is.
What's there is really all they did. The AH fleet didn't really see much more action than that either, with the exception of the faster cruisers and destroyers, and even they mostly sat in Pola and rusted too.
The images are fully licensed and fine, but I would recommend that
alt text be added. Also, is it know which one of the ships the lead image depicts.
I added alt text to the lead image, but I haven't yet come across anything that identifies which ship it is.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Well, I think any and all of my comments have been adequately addressed and as such this article meets the Good article criteria. Congratulations and well done! Cheers,
Abraham, B.S. (
talk) 04:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)reply
conversions
Don't forget to convert just about everything in the infobox! ;-) --
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 17:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Armament
"...the armor-piercing shell could penetrate up to 30 cm (11.8 in) of iron plate, the standard form of armor for contemporary ships". I think this ist wrong. I'd say that iron plate was outdated by 15 to 20 years by that time. --
84.177.89.117 (
talk) 15:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC) (
de:Benutzer:Marinebanker)reply
Sea-going
They were not "the first sea-going battleship built by Austria-Hungary". The Monarch class coastal battleships were nevertheless designed for the open sea but especially for coastal defence. Their main 12" guns were also centre-line.
109.151.159.83 (
talk) 09:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)reply