This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

So while I've an idea what these articles say, and can tell they're from reliable sources, I have no real idea of the content! This article can probably be expended without too much trouble, assuming you know German of course . Nik the stunned 11:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, I exchanged 3 links, which have been mostly seo or advertisment. "Gutefrage" was just a minor topic in this postings. The link, which I placed instead is more neutral and used as a reference in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutefrage.net -- AxelHellinger ( talk) 14:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Maybe we should move this article to "gutefrage.net" as it stands in the German-language article because that's the original writing of this website and it is shown on the logo.-- Maxeto0910 ( talk) 19:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Update: I used Template:lowercase title to change the visual site title.-- Maxeto0910 ( talk) 23:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Even while gutefrage.net is a large website and not so difficult to find because it produces a lot of content, it is hard to find reliable sources from 3rd party sites which are not related to or paid by gutefrage.net because at the end of the day it's just a forum offering low quality user content like most other forums or wikis. As of now most references are links to gutefrage.net itself and thus actually not reliable.

I started cleanup but rewriting the article would be good and not so difficult because the website doesn't seem to be relevant enough that the article could be that long. The numbers in particular (millions of users etc.) appear questionable. Killarnee ( talk) 03:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply