This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups. China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Writing systems Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kwukyel redirects here without explanation. Is it just a different spelling? If so, the article should note that. The Wiktionary lemma on the topic mentions something of a phonetic way to write Korean. How did it work? 82.139.87.215 ( talk) 00:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I imagine Kwukyel is a poor transliteration of the Korean word. What I'm more interested in is the Doosan Encyclopedia entry that is linked as an external link but seems to not exist anymore. Like all entries, it would be nice to see some of the content translated over from the Korean entry into the English entry. Matthew smith 254 ( talk) 03:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Kwukyel is Yale romanization of Korean, which is the standard in Korean linguistics. Sanxiyn ( talk) 16:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Placing some example Gugyeol here. Note that most are located within CJK Unified Ideographs, Extension A, within Unicode. Some appear to incorporate hangul or hangul-like motifs. Some may not necessarily be phonetic characters, but rather characters for native Korean words and terms. Wiktionary gives various explanations for some, such as "place name", "personal name", etc. See also wikt:Category:Korean-only CJKV Characters and wikt:kwukyel. This is by no means an exhaustive, nor accurate, list.

丷, 乊, 丆, 厼, 壭, 卪, 朩, 亪, 亽, 罖, 仒

ul final (ㄹ，乙)

• 乤(할) - phonetic 下 ha
• 乥(홀)
• 乧(둘) - phonetic 斗 (두, du) plus 乙 (을, ul) = 둘 dul
• 乬(걸) - phonetic 巨(거) + 乙 (을) = 걸 geol
• 乯(올) - phonetic 乎
• 乲(잘) - phonetic 次
• 乺(솔) - phonetic 所 (Korean: 소 so; Pinyin: suo)
• 乻(얼)
• 乼(줄) - phonetic 注 (Korean: 주 ju; Pinyin: zhu)

t final (ㄷ，(ㅅ)ㅈ，口匕)

• 唟(것) - 去
• 喸(폿) - bo/po (i.e. inner component of 葡, as in the 葡 in 葡萄, 포도 podo grape)
• 嗭(짓) - 真
• 夞(읫) - 外+ㅅ
• 巼(팟) - 巴+ㅅ (pa is the initial ideographic reading, ㅅ is the final)
• 廤(곶)
• 莻(늦) - 乃+ㅈ (neu is the initial ideographic reading, ㅈ is the final)

k final (ㄱ)

• 巪(걱) - 巨(거) + ㄱ

CJK characters that "appear to incorporate Hangul"

(most from List of CJK Unified Ideographs, Extension A (3400-4DBF))

motifs include ㅇ, ㄱ, etc

㪲㪳㫇㫈㔔㔖

note that motifs such as ㅇ, ㄱ do not exist in standard Chinese characters as radicals.

Other

㐃㐇㐈㐉㐊㐋㐍㐎㐏㐐㐑㐒㐓㐔㐕㐗㐘㐙㐚㐛㐝㐞㐟㐠㐢㐣㐥㐦㘒㖱㗤㗨㗽㘘㘜

Regards, --  李博杰  | — Talk contribs email 10:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gugyeol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310154634/http://www.encyber.com/search_w/ctdetail.php?contentno=20231 to http://www.encyber.com/search_w/ctdetail.php?contentno=20231

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply