This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in England may be able to help! |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Feel free to add to and modify this page, there is alot to add and go over.
There is a wealth of information on the web about the GM TiF but, unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time to edit at the moment. However, I've used a bit of the time I have to sort out some of the more useful links which could be used to add some balance to the article instead of it all being based on the GM Future Transport website. If you use any of them for referencing please delete them from the external links section as you go along. Richerman ( talk) 13:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1064750_date_set_for_ccharge_vote Parrot of Doom ( talk) 19:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: This does not however mean the respondents are opposed as anybody complaining about the current public transport system was counted as a negative response
I must admit that I have read this somewhere, but cannot see it in either of the two linked articles Paypwip ( talk) 20:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
The insistence from Joshii on his/her interpretation of the source is unhelpfuland not supported by the source. I have now changed the reference to quote directly from the sourceon tghe meaing of both negative and positive somments which seems the only evidence based way to resolve a difference of opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TIF Commentator ( talk • contribs) 21:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
If someone has online maps of the charging rings, and any proposed new public transport routes, I'd be happy to create a map for the article for them. Parrot of Doom ( talk) 13:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps, to resolve this little edit war, the quote would best be placed in his own article. Then just mention him in passing, in this article? Parrot of Doom ( talk) 16:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
This article needs updating to correct tenses, for example "would" to "would have", it could probably also use a section on the legacy i.e. The local councils drew up a shortlist of the most pressing and important bits of the TiF plans they wanted to keep and have together scrounged up £1.5bn from existing council local transport budgets to put into a central pot to fund it.
http://www.gmpte.com/content.cfm?subcategory_id=103073&news_id=6114641
Schemes Accelerated DfT Package Metrolink: Chorlton to East Didsbury Metrolink: Droylsden - Ashton Elements of Cross City Bus Package Park and Ride in Greater Manchester SEMMMS Scenario* Mottram Bypass and Glossop Spur* Leigh-Salford-Manchester Busway Metrolink: Rochdale Town Centre Ashton Northern Bypass Stage 2 Wigan IRR Metrolink : Airport and Second City crossing Fund contributions to stations Altrincham Interchange Bolton interchange Metrolink: Oldham Town Centre
Additional priorities awaiting further funding are as follows:
Metrolink - Trafford Park Stockport Interchange Stockport Town Centre Access Scheme East Lancashire Railway
83.104.138.141 ( talk) 23:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)