This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{ WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs South Dakota High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. United States: Colorado / Nebraska / North Dakota High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us! This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as High-importance). Kansas High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Oklahoma High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: Manitoba / Saskatchewan / Alberta / Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba. This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan. This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada. Mexico High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm sorry but that map is pure rubbish. The Ozark Foothills, Ouchitas Mountains and the Cross Timbers of eastern Oklahoma are not tall grass prairies. The Great plains end once you reach the cross timbers region in central Oklahoma. In fact that map of the great plains is also incorrect. They do not extend that far east in Oklahoma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kryan74 ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC) reply

That's true. I would consider just the Western part of Oklahoma to be part of the Great Plains, because it is part of the Central Great Plains ecoregion.

On the other hand, the Central tall grasslands which covers the Northern part of Iowa as well as Southwestern Minnesota might be considered to be part of the Great Plains as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.62.179.49 ( talk) 00:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Umm, what's the difference between "all or part" of Colorado (for instance) being in the Great Plains, and "much of" Iowa being in the same? This seems to be a distinction without a difference. If nobody objects, I'm just going to add Iowa, Minnesota, and Manitoba to the main list. john k 21:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC) reply

I removed Iowa and Minnesota and added Manitoba to the main list. While the southwest corner of Manitoba is arguably part of the Great Plains, there's *no* part of Iowa or Minnesota that's part of the Great Plains when defined as a land region; these states are also not generally considered part of Great Plains when defined as a human geography region. A map from the Center for Great Plains Studies (which uses a fairly expansive Plains definition) does not include those states either. – Swid ^{( talk | edits)} 02:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Why talk about the great plains without discussing more than in passing its climate, ecosystems, and history except as part of the USA? If that's true of all the American regions articles, that isn't very encyclopaedic. Climatologists please contribute! Ewjw 07:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Considering the article on Minnesota states that the Great Plains biome converges with two other distinct biomes, it should be included as a partial "Great Plains State". The southwestern portion of the state definately fits the climate and landscape typical of any other plains state. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.41.63.56 ( talk • contribs) .

A biome is a distinct (but related) concept from a land region; it's also possible that the information in the Minnesota article is incorrect. I've removed MN from the article for the time being. –  Swid ^{( talk |  edits)} 20:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Southwestern MN gets much more rainfall than, say, western South Dakota or western Kansas. The area around Kadoka is quite a bit different than the area around Worthington. AlexiusHoratius 20:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Further discussion of this point can be found at Talk:Minnesota/Archive_4#Biomes. Definitions differ; compare Encarta's article on the Great Plains (which includes Minnesota) with this article from the Geological Survey Bulletin (which excludes it). Southest Minnesota at the Coteau des Prairies especially has many of the characterics. But as mentioned above the Minnesota article no longer makes the claim. Kablammo ( talk) 16:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply

I have tried to find more information in order to extend this article, but have found very few reliable ones. User:Martian45

this might be a good place to start, if you hadn't checked already. -- W.marsh 18:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC) reply

According to the US census bureau Iowa is a Great Plains state: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwestern_United_States —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.190.186 ( talk) 17:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The problem with what you said there is that while Iowa (and also Minnesota and Missouri) are indeed sometimes called Great Plains states, none of the actual Great Plains lie in those states. It's an artifact of the way that people divide the Midwest for convenience into "Great Lakes" and "Great Plains" states, when Iowa is clearly "none of the above." There might be a place in the article for mentioning this problem, but I'm not the guy who should write it. 76.223.75.144 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Unless someone can support the reason for this tag, I suggest that it is unnecessary. This entry is clear and concise, it contains much of the basic information a reader might be interested in if they were unfamiliar with the term "Great Plains" as it applies to a large region in North America, and I cannot determine why it is considered "biased." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Staypuft9 ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC) reply

It's a geographic region that is a major part of canadian georgraphy, yet the map used depicts only the united states in its entirety, and cuts off the northern tip of the great plains. - TheMightyQuill ( talk) 18:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC) reply

If someone has a map of what comprises the Great Plains in Canada, I'll be happy to update the map used here. For what it's worth, much of the geographic information in the Canadian Prairies article could be moved or reproduced here; from my limited understanding, "Canadian Prairies" has stronger social and political connotations than "Great Plains" does in the United States. –  Swid ^{( talk ·  edits)} 22:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)whatever reply

198.200.132.69 ( talk) 01:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)It confounds me that prairie states like Iowa, Illinois, southern Minnesota, and much of Missouri are not included in some academic's definition of a plains state. Thus, this site is providing a great disservice to residents of those states and others that are indeed plains states and are not being included. The Great Plains do not begin at the Missouri River or the Missouri-Kansas stateline, no matter how convenient that may be. The buffalo roamed throughout the Midwestern plains, including the plains states of Iowa and Illinois, across the vast prairie and what early pioneers called the Great Plains. Pioneers did not look at Nebraska and say the Plains start here. This site is wholly inaccurate, not to mention subjective and biased. reply

Umm, no it's not. In fact, I have problems with the map featured in the article for extending too far east! The easternmost parts of the Frontier Strip: North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas most certainly are not in the Great Plains. These regions---and those to the east of them, including Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin, et. al.---are the Central Lowland, which, together with the Great Plains, make up the larger unit called the Interior Lowland. I should know; I've lived in the eastern part of one of the first 4 states I named for all my life, and almost everyone here knows that the Great Plains are farther west. 76.7.231.198 ( talk) 23:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The problem here is that there are many, many interpretations on where the Great Plains really lie. I generally follow the map set up by Walter Prescott Webb "The Great Plains" but that doesn't mean I'm right. I'd like to see more explanation on why we change the map because of academic research instead of personal intuition

In response to the above, unsigned comments -

It seems that most of you take issue with the eastern boundary of the Great Plains as depicted on the map. In fact, it is true that pioneers did not look at Nebraska and say, "here is where the plains begin!" However, the United States Government did not incorporate this area until much later, unlike places like Illinois, which were settled earlier in history. When places like Nebraska and the Dakotas were formally settled by "pioneers" as you say, they were settled AFTER railroads crossed the region. Likewise, these places have very distinct histories and human geographies from their eastern neighbors. Look at how smaller towns are spaced out in central Nebraska v. central Iowa or Illinois. This is not merely a consequence of more people in an area, it is a product of the historical context of these settlements.

So please, understand that "The Great Plains" is merely an imagined place. It is nearly impossible to delineate its boundaries based upon distinct physical differences in the natural landscape, as this "difference" occurs as a gradient rather than along a specific line. Moreover, academic experts studied literally hundreds of historical maps of the region to produce the end product seen in books like the Atlas of the Great Plains or in Wishart's Encyclopedia of the Great Plains (cited in this article). That is why we do not merely change the article's map according to "intuition" as one poster suggests. The issue of the map would never be settled under those conditions. Similarly, what is considered "Great Lakes" or "Midwest" relies upon historical boundaries associated with the Northwest Territory, rather than distinct physical unity throughout the region. So, I think it's a bit silly for some of you to suggest Illinoisans or Wisconsinites would consider themselves "plains" people. Not at all. These folks, just like those on the Great Plains, are drawing from both physical geography AND human history to construct their sense of place.

Rob Shepard ( talk) 17:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I don't feel that these photographs are descriptive of the overall Great Plains region. Any page visitor would consider the entire landscape nearly completely barren and devoid of trees when there are hilly regions (the Black Hills of course), marshlands, riverland, etc. If I weren't from the region I'd consider it from the photographs to be abandoned, dusty and empty. I hope the photo reviewers do a better job when allowing photographs to the page in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plainsman360 ( talk • contribs) 03:42, 26 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I agree. Prairie grass does not cover the entire state of Oklahoma as the map suggests.The boundaries map wipes out the Ouchitas, Ozark and Arbuckle mountain ranges. Also, the map of the great plains is incorrect. The plains do not cover that much of Oklahoma. This is the correct map.

http://alldownstream.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/greatplains.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kryan74 ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC) reply

If the article is about the Great Plains, and the Great Plains continue into Canada, why does the photo cut off the portion in Canada? And why does the suggested photo also cut off the plain's range in Canada? - Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.186.197.171 ( talk) 17:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

A plain is a topographical feature: flat land. A prairie is type of ecozone or bioregion featuring grasses and few trees. Most of North America's prairies occur on the plains, and most of the plains are naturally prairie, but they are not synonymous. Now in political geography, things are quite different: the Plains States are the in the US and the Prairie Provinces are in the Canada. But this article should focus on natural geography and leave human (esp. political) geography to the respective articles. -- Kevlar ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC) reply

I don't have an acceptable source for the following, but it is what I was taught in U.S. schools: The prairies were tall-grass lands (especially Iowa, northern Illinois and northern Missouri), whereas the plains were the short-grass areas, with mixed-grass areas sort of a muddle. Kdammers ( talk) 19:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Ok, here's my thing the Great Plains are west of the Mississippi. Did the authors of this article realize that the Mississippi runs on the border of Iowa and Illinois? So why not Include Iowa in the Great Plains area? The wind whipping weather should qualify it for this classification if nothing else... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.170.132.180 ( talk • contribs) 16:56, 20 December 2014

"The wind whipping weather..." sorta fails WP:Reliable sources. Vsmith ( talk) 18:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The lede has been changed changed from "The Great Plains are" to "The Great Plains is". Whether to use "is" or "are" depends of whether "Great Plains" is considered plural. Myself, I don't know. Opinions, anyone? More importantly, sources? -- A D Monroe III ( talk) 17:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC) reply

I'd always seen it as singular...it is a single, grand unit, but it wouldn't do to call it "the Great Plain". You got me thinking on it now. If it was a distinct, well-defined area of flat land, then a person would call it a "plain", but when it's more of an ideal with ill-defined boundaries, it seems fitting to call it the "plains", even though it may be unbroken area of flat land. A man on a horse "sets out across the plains", referring to a large, vaguely bordered flat area ahead. A smaller flat area between two mountain ranges, and you'd say he was "setting out across the plain". Here's a thought...a single, unbroken piece of flat land you can see to the horizon would be called a "plain". A land fifty miles across, broken by various ranges of small hills and rivers, would be "plains", because there are several areas divided from each other. A huge area like the Great Plains certainly refers to a single unit, but one which is made up of numerous smaller plains. Maybe the word "Plains" refers to numerous smaller plains, but the actual "Great Plains" area is referring to one, vast geographical area. When you say "the Great Lakes", you refer to multiple, individual lakes. Alternatively, "the Great Plains" is referring to a single, unbroken region, which would thus make it singular. You call the area around the Great lakes "the Great Lakes region", but "the Great Plains" are just "the Great Plains". That said, I just don't like the sound of "the Great Plains is". It should be "are". I've never been able to "learn" English the scholarly way; I just kid of do it. And even though I consider them definitely singular in nature (we aren't taking about several Great Plains, but one vast geographic are, after all), I would prefer to use the "are". Perhaps it's not "proper", but it fits with the "s" in "Plains" better. Aren't you allowed to break these rules in certain circumstances? AnnaGoFast ( talk) 02:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC) reply

It says that "the Great Plains are composed of prairie, steppe and grasslands"...what exactly is the difference between a prairie and a steppe? I looked at both articles, hoping it would become clear, but as far as I can tell "prairie" is just "Amerikin speek" for "steppe" (well, French-speak, I guess, since the Americans got the word from them). Doesn't that make saying "prairie and steppe" redundant? I've never heard of any steppe-land in the US. And technically, aren't both actually forms of grassland themselves"? AnnaGoFast ( talk) 02:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC) reply

My thoughts too. A prairie is a steppe, as far as I can tell. Alternatives: just "grasslands"; just "prairie"; "grasslands known as 'prairie'". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.26.234 ( talk) 11:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great Plains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718120206/http://daily.sightline.org/daily_score/archive/200Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflateAn-break-the-addiction to http://daily.sightline.org/daily_score/archive/200Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflateAn-break-the-addiction

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Plains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.cec.org/atlas/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080727134710/http://www.startribune.com/business/25868279.html to http://www.startribune.com/business/25868279.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Plains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081001235615/http://www.windtoday.net/info/articles.html?ID=57318 to http://www.windtoday.net/info/articles.html?ID=57318
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024013411/http://www.library.okstate.edu/okmaps/ to http://www.library.okstate.edu/okmaps/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Why would a US-centered map that doesn't even cover the northern part of the Great Plains be used? It should be replaced with something that shows the northern sections, as well as the Canadian provincial borders. There should be all state/provincial borders or nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.59.161 ( talk) 01:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Plains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130122000541/http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/land/arm_physio_plains/1 to http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/land/arm_physio_plains/1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109061905/http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/008271.html to http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/008271.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply

This article suffers from rambling text throughout. The wordiness dilutes the article's clarity. This is a general call for Wikipedians to help make this article succinct. — fcsuper ^{( How's That?, That's How!)} _{( Exclusionistic Immediatist )} — 02:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Is there a specific reason for having the French name in the lead of the article? RF354 ( talk) 20:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Because the northern regions of the Great Plains extends in to Canada, I would presume some thought it was relevant to French speaking Canadians. WiLaFa ( talk) 16:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the clarification. RF354 ( talk) 13:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Where is it? 2603:8082:9100:1E:C9E1:C47C:7C2A:551C ( talk) 00:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply