Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther ( talk · contribs) 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello there! Thanks for improving this article and showing initiate by nominating it for GA-status. I'll get started with the review right away and highlight any serious problems that may be found. Should there be only some minor flaws here and there, I'll correct them myself and notify you about my changes. I'll do my absolute best to review this article as fast and thorough I possible can. Kind regards and good luck! Jonas Vinther • ( Click here to collect your price!) 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Okay, after a quick glance on the article, I'm quickly failing this nomination per Point #2 in the GA-criteria. I count well over 30 subsections completely unsourced. A single CN tag, or two, or three, would be okay, but whole sections and paragraphs are not. The article seems to be written at a good level of English and the images used seems appropriate. In short, the article could be a worthy GA-nom if all its content is properly sourced to reliable sources. Good luck. Jonas Vinther • ( Click here to collect your price!) 01:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC) reply