 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
We are told by the law school that its bar pass rate is back up near the 70% mark. Tom Cod 08:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
There is NO WAY that GGU has an $800 million endowment. USNEWS lists it around $20 million. Can someone confirm and correct this number? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.75.174 ( talk) 23:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I saw that too, NO WAY. It may well be the university's worth in equity since they own a lot of prime real estate and other investments, which should not be confused with endowment. I cut/paste the amount shown on USNEWS. $21,151,867 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.193.198.24 (
talk)
if anybody knows any notable faculty please start a notable faculty section. same with the school of law.
fellow law alumni, with all due respect, unless you've been elevated to the bench or have some other notable achievement within the meaning of Wikipedia's definitions thereof (which "associate", "deputy PD", "deputy DA" or "staff attorney" do not rise to), please do not clutter up the notable alumni portion with your listing or that of your friends, otherwise all of us who graduated and passed the bar and have practiced for a few years could rightly be listed also; this is not the class notes section of the alumni magazine. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.16.198.152 ( talk) 22:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Merge with Golden Gate University School of Law
As much as the Law School would prefer to be considered separate, it is still a part of Golden Gate University and should not be separate, unless separate entries will be made for the other four schools. That is just my $.02. Musiclover ( talk) 23:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
On Harvard:
"As much as the Law School would prefer to be considered separate, it is still a part of Harvard University and should not be separate, unless separate entries will be made for the other four schools. That is just my $.02."
On Stanford:
"As much as the Law School would prefer to be considered separate, it is still a part of Stanford University and should not be separate, unless separate entries will be made for the other four schools. That is just my $.02."
And so on and so forth... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.235.135 ( talk) 07:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Golden Gate University. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070716073333/http://www.studyusa.com:80/factshts/ggu.asp to http://www.studyusa.com/factshts/ggu.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Golden Gate University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Pg7vCEwR?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nacubo.org%2FDocuments%2FEndowmentFiles%2F2013NCSEEndowmentMarket%2520ValuesRevisedFeb142014.pdf to http://www.nacubo.org/Documents/EndowmentFiles/2013NCSEEndowmentMarket%20ValuesRevisedFeb142014.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009071110/http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/cefa/staff/20050330_224.pdf to http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/cefa/staff/20050330_224.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)