 | This article was nominated for deletion on 290106. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
This needs more references (and easier to read references), but otherwise it is a completed article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panoptical ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Not exactly sure why this was merged, but I see NE2 has proposed a split of the Athens loop material into its own article. I also think it should be split into its own article. What do other people think? T C N7JM 22:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- I had asked in either the IRC channel or the WikiProject and was told that it should be merged into this page. If it should not be so, then can someone explain their reasoning? Thanks.
Allen (Morriswa) (
talk) 23:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I just figured out that, if you count
unsigned highways, then the southeastern part of this route actually has eight highways concurrent, and should have special mention on the
concurrency page. Also, a mention in this section/page should be added. The roads are:
US 29 /
US 78 /
US 129 /
US 441 /
SR 8 /
SR 10 Loop /
SR 15 /
SR 422!
Allen (Morriswa) (
talk) 23:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- I support splitting out the Athens loop as it has enough of a description and history independent of the SR 10 article to have its own article.
Dough
48
72 00:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am unsure if it should be re-split out, but, if it gets done or not, it needs a major rewrite. Also, the exit list needs to be revamped correctly.
Allen (Morriswa) (
talk) 00:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- What about it needs a major rewrite? I just wrote the bulk of that route description last December. It has the citations and everything. All it needs is to be touched up, and a couple of missing citations added, if you ask me.
T
C
N7JM 16:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought it needed a rewrite. It definitely needs some touching up, but I defer to one of you more experienced editors. If you read the "Bannered routes" section, you will see that there used to be another loop in Washington. Allen (Morriswa) ( talk) 04:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- What about it needs a major rewrite? I just wrote the bulk of that route description last December. It has the citations and everything. All it needs is to be touched up, and a couple of missing citations added, if you ask me.
T
C
N7JM 16:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am unsure if it should be re-split out, but, if it gets done or not, it needs a major rewrite. Also, the exit list needs to be revamped correctly.
Allen (Morriswa) (
talk) 00:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- I support splitting out the Athens loop as it has enough of a description and history independent of the SR 10 article to have its own article.
Dough
48
72 00:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I just figured out that, if you count
unsigned highways, then the southeastern part of this route actually has eight highways concurrent, and should have special mention on the
concurrency page. Also, a mention in this section/page should be added. The roads are:
- Support splitting. It's a beltway, more important than SR 10 (which is mostly a carrier route for US 78). Also: are there other SR 10 Loops? If not, the disambiguation is unnecessary. -- NE2 11:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support splitting. It can hold its own. -- WashuOtaku ( talk) 22:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This page is getting long, what I think is that:
- Each county segment shall become separate articles except for Columbia and Richmond counties
- There shall be a separate article for the concurrency of U.S. Routes 78 and 278 for both segments
Thanks 2600:1700:6180:6290:28B0:221A:EFC0:6E5B ( talk) 21:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose—this highway is only 172 miles in length, so the content just needs to be trimmed down. We don't need a turn-by-turn-by-turn description of the route of a highway at this level of unending detail. There's no precedent for county-level sub articles, nor should there be.
Imzadi 1979
→ 22:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just to put this in perspective, the following Featured Articles are on highways that are similar in length or longer than this one:
List
|
|---|
|
- So if we can write articles judged to be "Wikipedia's finest work" on these highways without the need to further split them, then we can do the same for this highway. Additionally, this is far from the only article on a highway in Georgia that has suffered from needless verbosity. They all need to be fixed because no one will bother to read these endless walls of text. Imzadi 1979 → 22:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- C-Class Georgia (U.S. state) articles
- Low-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles
- C-Class Atlanta articles
- High-importance Atlanta articles
- Atlanta task force articles
- WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) articles
- C-Class Georgia (U.S. state) road transport articles
- Mid-importance Georgia (U.S. state) road transport articles
- C-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- Georgia (U.S. state) road transport articles
- C-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles