This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance). Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state): Western NY This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Low-importance).

This is probably splitting hairs. But the company's official mailing address is Fairport, New York. This was recently deleted because it is not physically located. Fairport is located within the town of Perinton, New York. It's confusing on the article not including Fairport since that's where its official address is. Americasroof ( talk) 02:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC) reply

The former GateHouse's emergence from bankruptcy as New Media Investment Group, Inc. necessitates a name change from GateHouse Media to New Media Investment Group. Michealin ( talk) 20:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on GateHouse Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150405225555/http://www.patriotledger.com/articles/2006/06/07/business/biz01.txt to http://www.patriotledger.com/articles/2006/06/07/business/biz01.txt
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081028235326/http://biz.yahoo.com:80/ap/081022/gatehouse_delisting.html? to http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081022/gatehouse_delisting.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081201134919/http://www.theindependent.com/news/x1577092943/Independent-bought-by-World-Herald to http://www.theindependent.com/news/x1577092943/Independent-bought-by-World-Herald

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on GateHouse Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071026002500/http://www.editorandpublisher.com:80/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003662037 to http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003662037

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GateHouse Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.heraldnews.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17540128&BRD=1710&PAG=461&dept_id=99784&rfi=6
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211084925/http://investors.gatehousemedia.com:80/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=342310 to http://investors.gatehousemedia.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=342310
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100212221458/http://www.radarfrog.com:80/ to http://radarfrog.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Why not add that this company was purchased in February 2017 by the Tokyo-based Japanese company SoftBank? 173.88.241.33 ( talk) 01:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC) reply

(3 years later): Why not add that this company was purchased in February 2017 by the Tokyo-based Japanese company SoftBank? 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 00:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Do you have a reference for this? The article mentions GateHouse's relationship with Fortress (which is the company owned by Softbank), and the New Media Investment Group, Inc. merger/rebranding, what further information is missing? - Adolphus79 ( talk) 04:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I'm finding this page confusing. Is the company now called New Media Investment Group or GateHouse Media? Either way this page needs a deal of clarification. Pbruce1110 ( talk) 13:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GateHouse Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425122141/http://perinton.org/Data/Documents/maps/street%20pdf.pdf to http://www.perinton.org/Data/Documents/maps/street%20pdf.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306060540/http://investors.gatehousemedia.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=455214 to http://investors.gatehousemedia.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=455214

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC) reply

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

BridgeTower Media mentions currently bring you to the GateHouse Media wiki page, they aren't the same brand though. BridgeTower should be a page separate from GateHouse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buchi9192 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Reply 19-MAR-2020

  Wrong venue  

• Please make your request at the Bridge Tower media redirect talk page. Please be sure to provide references with your request, and to sign all posts using four tildes.

Regards,  Spintendo  13:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi all, I just completed an evaluation of this article for a Wiki Education exercise required for my graduate school course.

My main takeaway is that this article could use some academic analysis that provides some context around the relevance of GateHouse Media and its impact on the U.S. media ecosystem. Because the company has been fiercely criticized for its business practices and this is not reflected in the article, I worry that a reader without prior knowledge of the company would be given incomplete information about its cultural relevance. The old GateHouse Media website link also doesn't work.