Galileo (spacecraft) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on December 7, 2021, and December 7, 2022. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Galileo project was copied or moved into Galileo (spacecraft) with this edit on 27 January 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Galileo Probe was copied or moved into Galileo (spacecraft) with this edit on 4 February 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Previously this page was too big, but now that it refers only to the spacecraft, not the mission, it would be appropriate to merge it with Galileo Probe, it would be bizarre to have two tiny articles, one referring to the orbiter part, and another to the atmospheric probe part. Tercer ( talk) 09:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Agreed, the Cassini-Huygens article is about both the orbiter and Titan lander. This article is essentially the same situation, so they should be merged again. Healpa12 ( talk) 23:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
There are several navboxes which do not show the article title, are they relevant? If so, perhaps they should be combined, with collapsible sections. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I was reminded recently of the Galileo spacecraft's high-gain antenna failure to deploy, so looked at this article. Nowhere does it mention this failure. A Ctrl+F reveals nothing at all. I thought that I must've been thinking of a different spacecraft, but no, it was the Galileo spacecraft. As it turns out, all the information about this antenna failure is located on the Galileo project article. What a disgrace, an article which omits information so hard that it actually gas-lights people. BirdValiant ( talk) 16:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
See discussion here and comment there if interested. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 15:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
1802 takes a minimum of 16 clock cycles to execute any instruction, 6502 takes 2-7 cycles to execute depending instructions. 1802 instructions are very limited, access to memory is by having the memory address pre-loaded into a register, no general purpose subroutine call/return instructions which need to be implemented via software making subroutine calls very costly.
So I do not agree that 1802 (much as I liked it) was on a par with 6502. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.147.20.2 ( talk) 14:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)