This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Appalachia Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

i have a copy of a foxfire book, and the printing is from 1971. FYI.

I think a merger of these 3 articles ( Foxfire books, Foxfire Fund, and Foxfire (magazine)) makes sense for many reasons:

• Each article covers a different aspect of the Foxfire movement.
• Each article is short.
• Each article repeats much of the same information as the other articles.

For these reasons I think 1 comprehensive article covering the entire Foxfire movement would be better than 3 separate ones. McBrayn ( talk) 03:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Yup. Merge 'em all under the magazine, which came first and allowed the other two to exist. -- Orange Mike | Talk 18:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply