This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
I think it goes too far beyond the scope of the fort in the background section.
Bubba73(talk), 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Agree - it covers 200 years of Southeast settlement, rivalry among the European powers, the Spanish mission system, etc., for a fort that was used for only six years. This is not typical coverage of articles on forts and overwhelms content dealing with the fort. Needs to be more focused. Some of the material, written with great verve, should be applied to other articles on the Southeast.
Parkwells (
talk) 00:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply