From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fort Gordon)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 August 2019 and 22 November 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): VOwensHendrix.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Untitled

Units on this Base should also include: Detachment 1, 338 Training Squadron (USAF). The only Air Force Satellite Communications school—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.186.209.150 ( talkcontribs) 21:50, 13 February 2006.

Southeastern Signal School

Southeastern Signal School, which I attended during the Korean War following Camp Gordon's BTG Basic Training Group. The Basic Training was featured in Life Magazine in 1952. The magazine showed a unique feature of our training: The "Struggle Pit" where two platoons, one platoon shirtless the other wearing T shirts would go in this empty hole 4 ft. deep and struggle to empty the pit of one competing platoon by physically throwing them out. 206.246.28.178 ( talk) 14:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply

DDEAMC/SERMC

There no longer a SERMC. This command was turned over to SRMC based in San Antonio. Currently DDEAMC, its sub-commands, and other commands formerly under SERMC are now under SRMC. The current DDEAMC Commander is an O-6 position, rather than part of the regional commanding general's command.


TRJackson, 28FEBRUARY2012

doesn't link

I added Fort Gordon to my User:Oobspacer page and get the message that page doesn't exist even though i can search for it and see it in my browser. Am I doing something wrong or..., the link is working from this comment, very confusing. Oobspacer ( talk) 22:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Gordon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Soldier

My father was stationed at Fort Gordon in 1967, I am trying to find a picture of him or a yearbook so to speak of his squad. Is this possible? Thank you for your time and consideration.  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
Vsimmons1970 (
talkcontribs) 00:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
reply 


Fort Gordon has the worst food in the army outside of various bases in Germany. When I state this, it keeps getting deleted - which makes me assume there is some type of agenda to promote army food on Wikipedia. Valgrus Thunderaxe ( talk) 09:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Redesignation 27 October 2023

On 27 October 2023 at 9:00AM, at Barton Field this installation will be redesignated Fort Eisenhower. The entrance gate signs have been changed over, and are covered over with tarps until the 27th. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] -- Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 17:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Requested move 27 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per WP:SNOW. I've moved this article back to the original name prior to this as it has been unilaterally moved twice by one editor, who I will be talking to on their talk. ( closed by non-admin page mover) estar8806 ( talk) 00:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC) reply


Fort GordonFort Eisenhower – Today 27 Oct 2023 is redesignation day. The ceremony was live-streamed, the US Army web pages have already been moved, [7] the dignitaries have given their speeches, the Eisenhower family was photographed on post, the tarps have been removed from the new signs... -- Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 16:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I don't see any reason to not move it. Certainly the Army thinks it's Fort Eisenhower. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 17:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC) reply
I have already moved it. Death Editor 2 ( talk) 19:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC) reply

References

  • Support Are you ******* kidding me??? This is absolutely pointless. It is Fort Eisenhower. Close this discussion now as snowball and move the damn page already. Safiel ( talk) 03:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • And why would anybody move this page back just to have this pointless, ridiculous discussion anyway??? Safiel ( talk) 03:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support and I think, based on previous US military base renames earlier this year, an early close should be considered, even the back-and-forth move now. Skynxnex ( talk) 03:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support, it's the new name and should be updated the same as the other renamed bases have been throughout the year. - OdinintheNorth ( talk) 04:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support, now that the new name is effective WhisperToMe ( talk) 13:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support. WP:SNOW. It's not even a question. jhpratt ( talk) 21:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support and WP:SNOW. If no one moves this in 24 hours, please ping me. ― Justin (koavf)TCM 21:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

o'day

The ARCYBER page gives an integrated discussion of the units, which are grouped by o'day: Operate, Defend, Attack, Influence, and Inform.

According to the ref above, multiple units are part of NETCOM which, fits under O (operate).

Cyber Protection Brigade fits under D (defend).

The 915th cyber warfare battalion is now designated the 11th Cyber Warfare Battalion, which fits under A (attack).

There are other units which are part of the Fort Eisenhower installation which we need to further sort out. -- Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 01:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Added o'day detail: o d a i i -- Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 00:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC) reply