Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

	Fordham University has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 17, 2008 Peer review Reviewed June 16, 2017 Good article nominee Listed August 16, 2017 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles New York City High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance). United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fordham University/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jzsj ( talk · contribs) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply

I am in the process of reviewing this article. Jzsj ( talk) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexa-playjonimitchell.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC) reply

An unregistered editor has begun an edit war to insist that the description of this university's honors program include the phrase "a community of scholars for justice." The information is sourced to the honors program's own website but it strikes me as much more about advertising and promotion than about meaningful substance that is helpful for readers (without any examples and discussion, I don't even know what it's supposed to mean; it sounds a bit pretentious for a group of undergraduate students). It's certainly not something that an editor should edit war about. ElKevbo ( talk) 04:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Not in an edit war, I only undid your edit once. The honors program recently revised its curriculum; it remains substantively the same, though its new official motto is “a community of scholars for justice.” Each course in the new program incorporates the concerns of diversity or justice in some substantive way, subject to the instructor’s discretion. In other words, the phrase conveys meaningful information concerning the program, and is not an empty motto, which is why I undid your edit. -- 69.121.96.126 ( talk) 04:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Pictures of "significant" alumni and all the rest....

No, at least not compared to, for example, the Columbia University article. If I understand what this comment is trying to say. Indefatigable2 ^talk 19:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Drown Soda, was the GA review done on another talk page or work page? I ask because I don't see any commentary from the reviewer in the "GA Review" section transcluded above. If so, could you copy and paste it to this talk page with a link to where it came from? Rjjⁱⁱⁱ ( talk) 06:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Rjjiii: It has been a number of years so I cannot recall much about this—I do see there is no GA review on the talk page, which is abnormal. I see in my personal talk page archive that there were a couple of posts made by the reviewer, but not a review proper(?) - Drown Soda ( talk) 06:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

That's okay, thanks for checking. It's not uncommon for new reviewers to place reviews somewhere other than the review's page. Sadly, the reviewing editor has passed, so there's no telling. Take care, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ ( talk) 06:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply