This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Plants Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!

Why are there provinces listed that aren't in the United States? Like the Canadian Province, or the Arctic Province. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.104.94.236 ( talk) 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply

perchè sei sicuro che te ne devi andare a cagare? 93.66.84.217 ( talk) 15:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I have tagged this comment in the lead requesting a citation, though much of the article is also lacking information. Reasoning for the challenge is that Flora of Australia has 20,000+ vascular species and an estimated 250,000 Cryptogam species. Gnan garra 03:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

What is wrong? one of the most diverse temperate floras in the world. The Australian flora is not temperate, it is mostly tropical. Colchicum ( talk) 09:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Australian Flora isnt mostly tropical, if one was to exclude the tropical species the figure would be closer to 17,000. This doesnt mean that US flora isnt comparable to Chinas flora...exclusively/only comparable is a big statement. What I'm asking for is a citation attributing the comment or was it a Synthesis of published material by the article editors. Gnan garra 14:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061014223937/http://hua.huh.harvard.edu/FNA/ to http://hua.huh.harvard.edu/FNA/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply