Need an explanation for the guide number and for the different kinds of metering (TTL, ...).

I think the section on technique needs to be improved a huge amount. Flash isn't the only technique available, and it does not increase the efficiency of the flash - if anything it REDUCES the efficiency as it needs to be spread over a wider area! Tiberius47 06:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Needs a history section - was trying to find when it was invented but no info at all. I dont have any photo history references alas. Justinc 21:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC) reply

In "Dian Hanson's History Of Pin-Up Magazines Vol 2", Hanson says (chapter 4 p65), speaking of the particular fetishes that led Leonard Burtman to found "Exotique" magazine: "Thus Leonard Burtman, inventor of the photographic strobe, professional scientist and amateur photographer became a publisher." Obviously, this is just mentioned in passing, and the book exists mainly to reprint old pinups, but it seems reasonably well researched. Can anyone verify this information about Burtman? He doesn't have a WP page at current.

There are 3 different spellings for the bulbs in the article; flash bulb, flash-bulb and flashbulb. I was wondering which the correct spelling. AjaaniSherisu ( talk) 09:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) reply

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flashbulb
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/flashbulb
86.76.201.9 ( talk)

Could we make a new article on external flash units? -- The High Fin Sperm Whale ( talk) 01:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply

What will be the most effective definition of Flash-off in photography? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.150.126 ( talk) 13:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply

IMHO, the greatest flash photographer was Weegee; he handled a flash-powered 4X5 as if it was a 35mm. It would be great to find openly useable pictures of him with a Graflex with a flash gun next to an openly available flash picture by him. I will search.-- 74.88.152.221 ( talk) 01:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply

"Photographic lighting" is currently a redirect to this article, which is insufficient to cover the entire subject of photographic lighting. For example, professional photographers frequently use non-flash lighting sources in photography, such as in studio portraits. Photographic lighting even has a category, but no main, title, lead or "whatever you call it" article. The category can be found at Category:Photographic lighting. If you want to edit the page "photographic lighting" that is currently a redirect into an article, see this page. -- Kjkolb ( talk) 22:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC) reply

In the flashbulbs section the srticle states, "Later bulbs substituted zirconium for the magnesium, which produced a brighter flash and tended to temporarily blind people."

This is unclear as to whether it's the magnesium or zirconium did the blinding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.57.231 ( talk) 01:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I too found that line, as it was written, confusingly ambiguous. As magnesium is used in fireworks and stun grenades, I think it safe to assume that the writer intended to ascribe the blinding flash to it rather than to zirconium. I have reworded the line accordingly for clarity. Hertz1888 ( talk) 08:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply

It is still confusing as to which the sentence means is brighter, so I have reworded it again. It is the zirconium that was brighter, that is why the filling was changed. I can find no evidence that zirconium filled bulbs temporarily blinded people any more than magnesium or electronic flash units, so I have deleted that claim. If anyone can turn up a reliable reference that I have missed that this was so, then please restore the claim with the reference. DieSwartzPunkt ( talk) 18:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Flash (photography). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add

This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Photography High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

{{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150504144030/http://www.billjayonphotography.com/Dangers%20in%20the%20Dark.pdf. to http://www.billjayonphotography.com/Dangers%20in%20the%20Dark.pdf.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flash (photography). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714234752/http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1953_02_06.pdf to http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1953_02_06.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051031043733/http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/ to http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

/info/en/?search=Bowens_International states that Bowens produced their first system in 1950. This page states they came into use "late 1950s".

We are a bit short of references.

Bowens (a UK company) certainly seems to have been an early one, and innovated with the monobloc in the following decade. Midgley ( talk) 16:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply