This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Protected areas Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Congress High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) place(s). National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance). Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 30, 2007.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Geetram Hitnarine.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The article states "It was renamed Federal Hall when it became the first Capitol of the United States under the Constitution in 1789, and was the second Capitol of the United States (after the Maryland State House) since independence and union under the Articles of Confederation."

Is this right? I thought the list was as follows:

Chronological Table of the Capitals

First Continental Congress

September 5, 1774 to October 24, 1774:

   Philadelphia, Carpenter’s Hall 

Second Continental Congress

May 10, 1775 to December 12, 1776:

  Philadelphia, State House 

December 20, 1776 to February 27, 1777:

   Baltimore, Henry Fite’s House 

March 4, 1777 to September 18, 1777:

   Philadelphia, State House 

September 27, 1777 (one day):

  Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Court House 

September 30, 1777 to June 27, 1778:

  York, Pennsylvania, Court House 

July 2, 1778 to March 1, 1781:

   Philadelphia, College Hall, then State House 

Congress under the Articles of Confederation

March 1, 1781 to June 21, 1783:

  Philadelphia, State House 

June 30, 1783 to November 4, 1783:

  Princeton, New Jersey, “Prospect,” then Nassau Hall 

November 26, 1783 to August 19, 1784:

  Annapolis, Maryland, State House 

November 1, 1784 to December 24, 1784:

   Trenton, New Jersey, French Arms Tavern 

January 11, 1785 to Autumn 1788:

   New York, City Hall, then Fraunce's Tavern 

Congress under the Constitution

March 4, 1789 to August 12, 1790:

   New York, Federal Hall 

December 6, 1790 to May 14, 1800:

   Philadelphia, Philadelphia County Building–Congress Hall 

November 17, 1800:

   Washington, U.S. Capitol 

Source: Robert Fortenbaugh, The Nine Capitals of the United States, page 9.

See http://www.senate.gov/reference/reference_item/Nine_Capitals_of_the_United_States.htm

Cbmccarthy 21:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC) reply

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Current building was not the country's first custom house. See United States Custom House (New York City). Vzeebjtf ( talk) 01:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC) reply

I believe it may have been the first purpose-built specifically as a Custom House, but I agree it should be clarified. 72.251.70.158 ( talk) 18:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Lead

There seems to be a disagreement over revisions of the lead between me and an IP editor. My proposed lead is:

The first Federal Hall was built in 1700 on Wall Street in what is now the Financial District of Manhattan, New York City. It was the predecessor to the current New York City Hall, but later served as the first capitol building of the United States of America under the Constitution, and was the site of George Washington's inauguration as the first President of the United States. It was also where the United States Bill of Rights was introduced in the First Congress. The building was demolished in 1812.

The currently extant Federal Hall National Memorial was built in 1842 as the United States Custom House, on the site of the old Federal Hall, and later served as a sub-Treasury building. It is now operated by the National Park Service as a national memorial commemorating the historic events that occurred there.

The other editor's proposed lead is:

Federal Hall, built in 1700 as New York's City Hall, later served as the first capitol building of the United States of America under the Constitution, and was the site of George Washington's inauguration as the first President of the United States. It was also where the United States Bill of Rights was introduced in the First Congress. The building was demolished in 1812.

Federal Hall National Memorial was built in 1842 as the United States Custom House, on the site of the old Federal Hall on Wall Street, and later served as a sub-Treasury building. It is now operated by the National Park Service as a national memorial commemorating the historic events that occurred there.

The lead before yesterday was:

Federal Hall, built in 1700 on Wall Street in New York City's Financial District as the predecessor to New York City Hall, later served as the first capitol building of the United States of America under the Constitution, and was the site of George Washington's inauguration as the first President of the United States. It was also where the United States Bill of Rights was introduced in the First Congress. The building was demolished in 1812.

Later, in 1842, the Federal Hall National Memorial was built as the United States Custom House, on the site of the old Federal Hall, and later served as a sub-Treasury building. It is now operated by the National Park Service as a national memorial commemorating the historic events that occurred there.

I would like feedback on which wording (or combination thereof) is optimal. Epic Genius ( talk) 19:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

No, that is incorrect. I hope that's just a innocent mistake. I propose no change at all to the lead as it was for a very, very long time. It is you who changed the lead and when reverted started an edit war. Please correct your post. 72.251.70.158 ( talk) 19:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

What is incorrect? You removed "Financial District" in your version. I added a borough qualifier. My version explicitly states what is now the Financial District of Manhattan, New York City. As such, I will not correct it, as we were both reverting each other. Epic Genius ( talk) 19:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

I did NOT remove Financial District or anything else. You added it. I reverted your change to a long standing lead. I'm removing absolutely nothing. You are attempting to add stuff that frankly doesn't make sense. The financial district did not exist in 1700. The building was City Hall. Much later it was used by the new federal govt under the Articles and the Constitution and became known as Federal Hall. The first sentence should succinctly and very clearly state only the most important facts, what the article is about. 72.251.70.158 ( talk) 19:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

The financial district did not exist in 1700. The building was City Hall. Much later it was used by the new federal govt under the Articles and the Constitution and became known as Federal Hall. I know, that's why I said "the predecessor to the current New York City Hall" and "what is now the Financial District of Manhattan, New York City", with which we can succinctly state the point in two sentences (or one, if we can do that). Epic Genius ( talk) 20:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

But why? It's totally unnecessary wordiness, not important to a clear and succinct statement about the importance of the topic. That its site is now in what we call the Financial District is irrelevant to its importance. What was wrong with the long-standing wording? It's of national historical importance. It's neighborhood can come later and/or in the infobox. And why say one City Hall was "predecessor" to another City Hall? The importance to the article is that it was built in 1700 as City Hall. 72.251.70.158 ( talk) 20:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Which I addressed in the edit that I made 15 minutes ago as of this revision. Then you reverted it, twice, with a misleading edit summary to "status quo". May I note that the edits I made in December 2014 are irrelevant to the status quo as of today, which would be this edit.

Going back to that content issue, the location is important. I should note that "New York's city hall" is much less precise than "...in what is now the Financial District of Manhattan, New York City. It was the predecessor to the current New York City Hall...". In some cases, wordiness is better. Epic Genius ( talk) 20:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Just to clarify, I prefer the longstanding version of the lead as it existed before your changes of 9 December 2014. Sorry if that was unclear. It just occurred to me that you may have forgotten you made your changes then, but they certainly are completely relevant. It is those changes that are the issue. As to substance, "New York's City Hall" is obviously in New York. It is indeed less precise than your wording, but the precise location is not necessary to the first sentence of the lead. It is important elsewhere in the article. And it was the City Hall before the current City Hall but that is not important in the lead about the topic Federal Hall. It too can come later if you feel it's relevant. The lead as written before your changes was better than after in my opinion. 72.251.70.142 ( talk) 20:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Yeah, but where in New York? It may be obvious to you, but less so to others. If it's New York City, you should add a link, which I have. Epic Genius ( talk) 20:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I agree that's an improvement. 72.251.70.142 ( talk) 20:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Image sizes

The images do not need to be that small. They can be invoked using the |upright= parameter in the images, so I have set up the upright parameters to be 1.0, 1.15, etc. to correlate with desired image sizes on mobile devices. For an IP user, these sizes are 220px and 253px for the upright values 1.0 and 1.15, respectively. Registered users can make the size smaller or bigger, but using just |upright| sets the default image size for an IP user to 165px, which is too small for the average reader's comfort. Epic Genius ( talk) 19:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

I'm not too concerned with image size. The policy at WP:IMGSIZE is to use standard thumbs in most cases. For exceptions, "upright" is preferred to the forced "px" values you were using. 72.251.70.158 ( talk) 19:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

OK, then we can set upright ratios. Epic Genius ( talk) 19:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

For exceptions, yes. 72.251.70.158 ( talk) 19:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Well, these are exceptions. The upright ratios and the details of the images indicate somewhat exceptional circumstances. Epic Genius ( talk) 20:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federal Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927183607/http://articles.cnn.com/2002-09-05/politics/federal.hall_1_congress-federal-hall-building?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS to http://articles.cnn.com/2002-09-05/politics/federal.hall_1_congress-federal-hall-building?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC) reply