This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Most suburban and many other school districts are called "Union Free School District". Shouldn't the article explain the significance of this term?
Jim.henderson (
talk) 16:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Education in New York (state). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
In March 2017, the New York Times reported, "The Board of Regents on Monday eliminated a requirement that aspiring teachers in New York State pass a literacy test to become certified after the test proved controversial because black and Hispanic candidates passed it at significantly lower rates than white candidates."[1]
and commented
(rv; obviously undue, not a major part of the overall history of education in New York State.)
Allowing people who can't read to be hired as public school teachers is heavily relevant to the subject of education.
I propose that this content be put back in the article.
The rest of the article covers extremely sweeping long-term issues related to the topic; focusing excessively on a single article that seems to have received minimal
WP:SUSTAINED coverage is clearly giving it undue weight. If you think that this has had a significant impact on New York state education as a whole, it should be easy to find long-term coverage highlighting its importance, surely? Without that it feels like its inclusion would be unbalanced. There are many, many articles related to various aspects of education in New York state, and countless changes to policies connected to it each year; what about this particular aspect makes it so important relative to the others? The article also doesn't reflect your framing (it was just one of several tests, and was removed over concerns that it was discriminatory - failing it does not mean that someone is illiterate.) --
Aquillion (
talk) 03:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Your reply is very well thought out, and makes multiple good points. Thank you for your comment. I will not be putting the content back in the article.
Brock88734 (
talk) 11:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)reply