This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve
New Jersey–related articles to
Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the
discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Headline
What's the deal with the "To Wikipedia..." headline? It seems like it doesn't belong. --
BOARshevik 05:20, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
It doesn't, and now it's gone. (You should feel free to edit such things away, as well! ) -
Nunh-huh 05:23, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I could have, but I didn't know if it should just be changed or removed entirely. --
BOARshevik 05:08, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
Merger
Against merger I see no reason to merge with
West Jersey; the two provinces were separate, and matters which concern only one - including the present status of the Proprietors - should be in the individual articles. Common matters should go in
Province of New Jersey.
SeptentrionalisPMAnderson 15:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Against merger These are clearly more closely related than North Carolina, and South Carolina, but still they are different topics. BTW, I took the liberty to put the (against merger) tag on the above vote.
Smallbones 20:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)reply
against mergerThe article as it stands now actually discusses
West Jersey more than
East Jersey, but that can be corrected. the province was distinctly different from it's southern neighbor it terms of it's culture and development. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Djflem (
talk •
contribs) 20:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Against merger My apologies for coming into this late. I had started both of these pages and originally had significant East Jersey -specific content. On December 12 2005 someone deleted much of this EJ material and then shortly after that somebody pasted in the material that related to West Jersey. I will try to repair it sometime soon, but this week I am swamped.
ArloBee 02:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Against merger OK, I briefly trudged out of my swamp and put back the East Jersey content that was West-ified back on December 12/13, 2005. Does this settle the question of whether to merge?
ArloBee 03:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)reply
I have just modified one external link on
East Jersey. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.