This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Arthropods Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Fisheries and Fishing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Oregon Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Doesn't it seem premature to accept this generic designation? In particular, this designation by Ng et al. is not supported by the molecular study of Harrison. So, I suggest reversion back to Cancer. -- 192.211.24.221 ( talk) 23:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC) reply

It looks to me like the picture labeled "Ganges Harbour" is actually of a Red Rock Crab, not a Dungeness, though it is a little hard to tell because the crab is so covered in barnacles and mud.

You were correct. I moved the image to the correct page. Dger ( talk) 03:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

I deleted "Dungeness crabs average 25% edible meat" because it's unclear. Does it mean:

- If you take all the meat out, 25% of it is edible? I don't think that's right. - If you take all the meat out, it weighs 25% of the weight of meat+shells? Maybe - If you take all the meat out, it'll take up 25% of the space that meat+shells would? Maybe.

Citing a source here would help. Travisl 16:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC) reply

The percent of meat recovery in the Dungeness Crab is based on total overall weight of each individual crab. For example a two pound crab would have about 1/2 pound of meat at 25% recovery. ( User:Jeff, Commercial Fisherman, Oregon Coast) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.242.69.3 ( talk • contribs)

So it would be correct to say "One quarter of a typical dungeness crab's weight is edible meat"? Travisl 14:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC) reply

It would be nice if someone would include the age required to grow large enough for consumption. I've heard that these crabs take quite a few years to get big enough to eat. -- User:eluusive

Maturity at around two and one half years. Legal size is six and one fourth inches. Most like the legs, calws, and body meat, not including the organs and such. Some boil the crab in ocean water, this gives it a distinctive flavor. Refer to the main article for further details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dungeness crab ( talk • contribs)

That's the legal size that the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife requires in the state of Washington. Other jurisdictions may have differing regulations. Travisl 14:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC) reply

It would be great if somebody could give a hint about the pronounciation of "dungeness". -- Stilfehler 13:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Like "Dungeon", with a "ness" at the end of it. HTH. 24.6.157.14 ( talk) 06:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

The cookery section's a mess. There's no cites, except for a video about getting to the meat. The statement that "Dungeness crabs can typically be purchased either live or pre-cooked" contradicts "keeping them alive in aquaria for even a day will degrade their quality." And my personal experience (which is not a reliable source, I know) is that they will eat outside of their natural environment -- I caught one in Hood Canal, tossed it in a 5-gallon bucket with sea water and a fish, and two hours later, there the crab was in the bucket with only half a fish. Travisl ( talk) 18:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply

The statement about 25% meat, and there being more in the legs than the body, also contradict my personal experience. Also, there's a cultural bias. Dungeness crab is cooked in many different ways - there are a number of Asian variants (American adaptations, presumably, because it's a local crab), some Latin American versions, and it's also an ingredient in Cioppino. If someone really wants to help they could locate a comprehensive article about crabs and distill some cited culinary information from that. Other useful things might be economic importance, fishing seasons and methods, trade, local customs... - Wikidemon ( talk) 11:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC) reply

The information regarding degradation may be incorrect, but it really isn't a contradiction with regards to purchasing crabs alive or pre-cooked. Many restaurants will buy crabs alive for same day cooking. I've removed the contradiction tag, but you may wish to remove that whole line regarding the degrading of their quality since I can find no source for that statement. However, again, it's not really a contradiction. Thanks. Kjnelan ( talk) 07:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC) reply

What is meant by the starvation process that is mentioned in the article?

Shouldn't this be in (miniscule) small letters? i.e. dungeness crab

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dungeness crab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606061453/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s17/s17rbz.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s17/s17rbz.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dungeness crab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/691pg10vD?url=http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/MBA_SeafoodWatch_DungenessCrabReport.pdf to http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/MBA_SeafoodWatch_DungenessCrabReport.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611123205/http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measures/hjr1.dir/hjr0037.en.html to http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measures/hjr1.dir/hjr0037.en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

I just added in a section about cracking crabs as a way of preparing them and now I see that someone has removed it. Why are you doing this? 2605:8D80:461:F65:18B4:A021:8026:D695 ( talk) 07:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I have been going through and trying to make sure all the source links work and are credible. The source https://www.dungeness.com/crab/ does not contain original information but does not list sources. I do not think this is a credible source and so am deleting it. Feel free to undo this change SprengerSprenger ( talk) 05:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The citation for the video on how to crack crab does not appear to be working. I feel like the information linked to this source could be found in other sources. SprengerSprenger ( talk) 05:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I replaced the video with other sources that had the same information SprengerSprenger ( talk) 06:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

In the second paragraph in the mating and ecology section, it addresses a parasite the crabs can have. This does not seem to fit in this section. I understand that the information stemmed from the description of the environment, but it seems like the specifics of the parasite could be addressed in a separate section. SprengerSprenger ( talk) 06:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply