This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||
|
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.
I'd like to inquire about adding the following web site to this page. It is a complete information and business database for Douglas County Georgia. The page is titled Douglas County Georgia - Metro Atlanta Guidebook http://www.metroatlantaguidebook.com/douglascounty/ Thank you, Paulette
This is the only county entry I've ever seen with a listing of subdivision names. That was a lot of work to whoever entered the list, but do you think it is necessary? -- Mjrmtg 05:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it's necessary, I've done a little clean up to the page, and with the original authors permission, I would like to delete it, or clean it up to maybe a paragraph stating some of the more well known subdivisions. I am a resident of the county, and most of these places are common names, but to most outside of Douglas County/Douglasville, they are non essental. Perhaps link to maybe Tributary or Brookmont, two subdivisions that are large in scale, and being built currently. -jazman82
This is the only county page that lists subdivision names, and they aren't necessary at all. -- Mjrmtg 01:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Moving the subdivision names to talk page for now, if nothing is done with them in 6 months, they'll be removed from the talk page also. -- Mjrmtg ( talk) 20:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I removed the obviously false "record lows" for Douglasville, GA. The state record low is -17F; -24F is not real data.
However, should someone find real, sourced data, feel free to add that. The record highs look more realistic, but are also "unsourced"... Ryoung122 16:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Douglas County, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
In the absence of reliable sources supporting it, I've removed the claim that Frederick Douglass was the original namesake of the county. — C.Fred ( talk) 04:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Douglas County, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't really have time to fix it at the moment, but the numbers in this section need some closer inspection. Chances of the same number of people in the 2000 census matching the 2010 census is extremely unlikely and already contradicted by the historical population table already included in the demographics section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dypsonian ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)