This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
"The following two sentences are untrue. The word description can be used interchangeably with the word theory in physics. When an observer is said to describe an event, experiment, or observation, this is a direct reference, which means a theory describes the event, experiment, or observation." A quite peculiar form of expressing one's disagreement, I'd say. --
Oop (
talk) 03:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)reply
These statements have now been removed.—
Anita5192 (
talk) 04:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Bertie
Since Bertie Russell's 'classical texts' are mentioned they should get proper references.
31.52.255.231 (
talk) 11:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)reply
If you read the Philosophy section carefully, you will see that
Bertrand Russell's classical texts are already linked as the
nature of description. That article has the references you seek.—
Anita5192 (
talk) 15:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)reply