This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article says 4 largest and bigger then Incheon but article about Icheon says that it has 2,466,338 and Daegu has 2,500,000 which means Daegu must be bigger and therefor number 3 biggest?? Lennart.larsen 07:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Someone changed the article and I fixed their attempted change. Clearly, the cities are about the same size, but the official government [ website] lists the order as Seoul, Busan, Daegu and then Incheon so that's how I left it. Swegner 08:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
it might be difficult to provide citations for assertions such as the ones about the fine 50% of Daegu and apples, which by the way are offically Seongju apples, I think (didn't realize that they were exported, however, which is what the statement in the article implies). These are popular cultural assertions that everyone living in the local area hears and incorporates into their realities as Gyeongbuk people, and so they are important to include in articles such as this. How shall we deal with providing citations for such popular well known beliefs? Perhaps there are Korean publications about local Daegu culture that we can cite? PLease give your thoughts. Mumun 19:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
looks like vandalism, especially the stuff about biting fishcakes, etc. Would the persopn who added this highly unusual material please explain themselves fortwith? Of what importance is such material for an encyclopaedia that is supposed to introduce Daegu to the general public. Relevance? Mumun 16:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
What is a "citizen soccer team", of which we say that Daegu FC is one of the best? Does it simply mean an amateur team? 219.78.126.3 ( talk) 16:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daegu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Daegu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nhic.or.kr/cms/board/Download.jsp?fileId=46232&communityKey=B0070{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ssartpia.or.kr/eng/s01/s01_main_01.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.dg-athletics.or.kr/english/pages/main/main.jspWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
In May there were a number of problematic, promotional edits to this article by an account that might have been associated with the city in some way. They can be seen here. Help in eliminating promotional language would be appreciated, per WP:PROMO and WP:WEASEL. Dekimasu よ! 17:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, it's October now and I just reverted some more edits by the same user that were made a month after you posted this. These edits also seemed promotional. I just thought that I should continue this section of the talkpage Dekimasu, to let everybody know that this might be a reoccurring issue and I also had to change a large potion of the article and that deserves more explanation than I put in my edit summary. Anyway, I hope my reversions were okay. Some other edits got caught in the cross hairs and I'm going to try and restore them if still relevant. GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk) 03:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Xxpooun, I am summoning you here to talk about the fact that you just reverted all my edits, including reverting my reversion of the content added by daegucity.kr. Most of the stuff added by them was unsourced and, in my opinion, a violation of W:NPOV. Such examples include information about the cities logo & brand character replacing the city's history, the sections talking about site-seeing written in the second person(a violation of WP:YOU, the deletion of all mentions of accidents. There might also be some violation of MOS:HEAD with the fact that a bunch of the section headings are bolded, but I'm not 100% sure on that. There's also with the issue that that large majority of sources got deleted. Basically, would you like to talk about this here in the talk section? Thanks for your time! GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk) 13:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
daegucity.kr Hi, I just reverted some of your edits(again, I'm sorry!) and as I stated I'm continuing to discuss them here on the talk page. Basically, I reverted them because other wikis aren't generally considered to be reliable sources. Also, some of your information was repetitive, like the section on Daegu becoming a metropolitan city. That information was already in the previous section. There's also the issue of some of the headings violating MOS:HEAD, with being bolded and with adding inline citations directly in the header. Finally, some of the information, while it may be verifiable, doesn't seem worthy for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Information about the number of households in the city, for instance, while an interesting statistic, doesn't seem notable enough to be a part of the encyclopedia article. If you disagree with me, that's fine, but I just figured that we could sort this out on the talk page rather than through edit summaries and possible gather others' inputs. GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk) 21:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
daegucity.kr Hello again, I hope I'm pinging you right! I see that you reverted the material removal I did, which is a-ok, but you didn't leave an edit summary explaining why you did, and those same violations I spotted are still in the text? I'd just like to talk here before we get into an edit war or something, so I'm reverting you again. The bolding of the heading is something I don't want to stand, because I'm pretty sure it's an issue for vision-impaired viewers who have to use screen readers, and everything else I explained pretty clearly up above I think. (please, let me know if I didn't) I'd just like to come to an agreement here! Thank you so much for when you take the time to respond!
GreenLipstickLesbian (
talk) 23:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
GreenLipstickLesbian Hello, I just want to update the page. And I do not understand why my edits especially on the population numbers on every Daegu districts, kinds of industry that Daegu has, Universities and locations in Daegu, etc are promotional content. Are they consider as promotional content? Thank you. Daegucity.kr ( talk) 17:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
GreenLipstickLesbian Hello, thank you for your reply, explaining the mistakes in details. I have more understanding about the situation and my edits. But of course I have lots to learn. I did cited my edits with book reference and an updated 2018 Korean document about Daegu city, why do you think those edits be referred also? I hope you are well in your country and we can work this out with updated information on the page. I still have photographs and sightseeing places to add in but I am afraid if I edit again, I will be blocked or something. I would love to make this page updated and syncwith the Korean page as well but my English is a limit in some ways. What do you suggest I do now? Daegucity.kr ( talk) 19:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)