This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Florida Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've no idea how you do this in wiki, but there is an interesting section on Florida culture in the wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_the_Southern_United_States, especially about the two cultural "poles" present in the state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.50.208 ( talk) 11:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply

"other things with the Spanish, especially Cuban and Puerto Rican." Spanish is not a synonym for Latino. 97.81.126.198 ( talk) 23:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC) reply

In this series of edits mostly by Johnsummers22, a god deal of content was added, none of it cited to sources. Some of it might be interesting and appropriate if cited to reliable sources, other aspects ar probably not appropraite under any circumstances, such as mention of a specific restaurant in Tampa (arguably promotional). Does anyone want to look for sources for these statements? They should not be reinseerted without sources, in my view. DES ^(talk) _{DESiegel Contribs} 21:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply

@ DESiegel: EranBot detected that at least one of the edits was a copyvio. Given that none of it was cited, I'd say it probably all was (large chunks of uncited text are usually copyvios). I can't currently check due to Earwig's tool being town for whatever reason, but I remain quite confident that it is. I'd recommend that all revisions added by him be redacted. — Compassionate727 ^{( T· C)} 21:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Thank you, Compassionate727. I see you have formally requested a revision deletion. I will review and do the deletion if I can confirm that there is a significant copyright issue here. note that suspected copyvios are not usually reason enough for a revdel. DES ^(talk) _{DESiegel Contribs} 21:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Compassionate727 I have now done the revdel on all the revisions containing the Billy Graham text, which was clearly a copyvio. DES ^(talk) _{DESiegel Contribs} 21:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply

@ DESiegel: I just entered all of the added chunks by hand. Only the Bill Graham section returned similar portions in a search engine. I stand corrected on the others. — Compassionate727 ^{( T· C)} 21:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Also, I think you missed one: Revision 839183980. — Compassionate727 ^{( T· C)} 21:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply