Copenhagen Metro was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Copenhagen Metro route diagram. |
Hey ... Thanks for this. I'll to turn it into an article as soon as possible. Thank you! PZFUN 03:54, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Just a nitpick, but yellow text on a white background is very hard to read. 85.76.152.179 05:56, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Anyone with knowledge about the overground stations on the way to Vanløse from Nørreport is encouraged to add information about their construction and what have we. I think they run on the ground as normal trains, and not on embankments as on Amager, but I'm not sure, and I haven't been able to find any pictures of or information about them. -- Ghent 11:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
To settle that "rail rapid transit rail system" bit, I think that it should be "rapid transit rail system" or "rail-based rapid transit system" because we're not transporting rails here. ;) My personal opinion is that "rapid transit rail system" is better because you go from generic to more specific terms - the logical way. Ghent 15:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm wondering whether 40 km/h is the correct average speed. M1 is stated as 13,9 km and http://www.rejseplanen.dk/ gives a travel time of 24 minutes, which works out to 34.75 km/h. M2 is stated as 14,2 km and the travel time seems to be 25 minutes, which works out to 34(.08) km/h. I don't think the system average can be higher than the line averages? Lcpitkan ( talk) 08:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Reviewer: ---
Dough
48
72 16:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments:
I am placing the article on hold. --- Dough 48 72 16:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The article no longer meet GA criteria (most obviously for referencing) but I've edited it too much myself to carry out an individual reassessment. I've thus tagged the talk page accordingly. Schwede 66 00:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi all! I am not an expert in Copenhagen Metro (have only taken it once), but I noticed apparently there are two missing stations, Ørestad and Femøren, on both branches. Please have a look :) – PeterCX& Talk 20:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Much of this is obsolete. Work on the circle line tunnels have been going on for some time. The branch to Brønshøj has been abandoned. Another branch has been decided, though work has not started, so the politicians may yet change their minds. It will branch from Østerport and terminate at Nordhavn, with only two stations. -- Klausok ( talk) 07:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I second Klausok's comment; an update regarding Brønshøj and Nordhavn branches is needed, as well as other temporal updates, since it has been a while since it has been approved as a good article. I have made a few temporal updates just now, but there are still some things mentioned twice here and there, and in the first half there is only reference to M3 but not M4. I also think the Sydhavn proposal can be expanded upon. Perhaps all mention about City Circle Line should be cut short in this article and moved over to the CCL article exclusively? - that way only one article needs to be updated as construction proceeds and tons of news articles about upcoming scandals ;-) are added. Unless someone else takes the ball, I'll probably come back and do that.
Also worth checking out: updated map (including Nordhavn proposal and with Brønshøj removed) and timeline (in Danish), which I have added today as ref name "timeline" in section "Future". -- Katana ( talk) 01:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Copenhagen Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Copenhagen Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Copenhagen Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Copenhagen Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Copenhagen Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sydsvenskan.se/malmo/article1539436/Sundsmetro-blir-fraga-for-EU.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rejsekort.dk/Hjaelp/FAQWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
The article reads:
While a 6 train per hour (tph) service with 8-car trains, moves 48 cars per hour in each direction, Copenhagen Metro with 30 tph with 3 cars only, actually moves 90 cars per hour in each direction. So, in terms of capacity, the Copenhagen Metro is equivalent to a system with 8 cars and 12 tph (or a train every fifth minute).
I honestly having a hard time understanding what point this section is trying to get across. Can someone maybe clarify? -- 2001:700:300:2211:4472:F664:1599:9F4E ( talk) 13:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
This article has been tagged for a GA reassessment. There are a lot of citation needed tags added about the time the request was made. Can these be dealt with so the article can maintain its Good status. AIRcorn (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Looking through this page, I have noticed that their are certain sections of the article that doesn't have any references in it at all which in my eyes would fail if it was done today. There is also the fact that in the section, "Future lines discussed", there isn't enough prose in this section to have this bit of the article. Add to the fact that their are sections which needs a reference and it's probably worth a shot at maybe reassessing this article. HawkAussie ( talk) 04:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
In particular, the Service section. There is a law-mandated new surcharge on the Metro: More metro costs a little bit more. CapnZapp ( talk) 21:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
As I said, the article needs updating. In particular, to cover the surcharge that's directly linked to the Metro expansion expense. Regards, CapnZapp ( talk) 16:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)