This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force Mexico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. North America Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. United States: Old West / Hispanic and Latino / Mexican-Americans Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West. This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force. This article is supported by the Mexican-Americans task force. California High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The text was originally written by rjensen for Wikipedia and Citizendium.org and is available for reuse here under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). Rjensen ( talk) 04:03, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I have a problem with the title of this article. It seems very non-neutral, very POV, to call this historical event a "conquest" - which implies the writer is taking sides between the "victor" and the "vanquished". Also, I doubt very much that someone looking for information about how California became part of the United States would look under this search term. -- MelanieN ( talk) 14:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

The Mexicans and the Americans and the Californians all considered it a conquest--and the historians as well. In what way is "conquest" non-neutral? The facts are not in doubt that 1) there was a war 2) US Army moved in and took over 3) result was California went from Mexico to USA. The dictionary (Webster 3rd) defines "conquest" as "territory definitely appropriated in war" Rjensen ( talk) 15:11, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

"""let me add that both that latest and the oldest scholarship uses "Conquest" --the newest is Robert W. Merry, A Country of Vast Designs: James K. Polk, the Mexican War and the Conquest of the American Continent (2009) Rjensen ( talk) 15:17, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

@ MelanieN and Rjensen: I think the question is what is the WP:COMMONNAME? While I think "California Campaign" is a very neutral term, it only brings back 3.7k hits, of which under 1k are books. A summary of the U.S. Army history up until 1917, gives the events of the American effort in Alta California less than a paragraph worth of content (pages 187-188), and no specifically named campaign streamer. "California Conquest" only returns under 2k hits. The current name has the most hits (123k), with 14.2k hits in books alone.-- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 00:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC) reply

There are missing a few words about the Junta of Monterey, their leader Castro was not Mexican, he was Californio -- Roksanna ( talk) 13:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply

It would be good to have more information from the Mexican point of view. For example, all the figures of losses seem to be Americans. Or are Mexican records unavailable? It would also be good to have more details on well, everything. Ernest Ruger ( talk) 09:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conquest of California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101131835/http://www.bearflagmuseum.org/BancroftIntroTOC.html to http://www.bearflagmuseum.org/BancroftIntroTOC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply