From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is what Im talking about concerning pointless pages.

Okay, the country in Canada was a bit extreme, but this is clearly a violation of template: insignificant pages or whatever you call it. MikeyOHoolihan 02:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Restricter plate vs CoT

The last sentence of the intro paragraph, talks about changing to a CoT. But it doesn't explain what a CoT is, and neither to do I. Either a wikilink or some sort of explaination is needed. --Pilotboi 03:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Discussion copied in from Talk:Coca-Cola 400 at 06:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Is this the official name?

I have not seen any site officially call it the Coca-Cola 400 yet and I have not seen that picture on NASCAR.com, Daytona's site or any other site. It just says a Coke brand (not necessarily Coke) will be the sponsor. I've even heard of it being the (Coke brand) Firecracker 400 again. CrazyC83 02:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Improper move

This page was improperly moved (via a copy-paste rather than a history-preserving move) from Pepsi 400. A request has been filed at WP:SPLICE to merge the two histories, which is required by the GFDL. -- Kinu t/ c 21:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Paul Revere/Brumos Porsche 250 Split Discussions

I am proposing that the section "Paul Revere 250" and its Winners sub section should be mereged into its own article called Brumos Porsche 250 and have Paul Revere 250 redirect to Brumos Porsche 250. The 3 main reasons why I request this is becasue:

  1. It does not really have anything to do with NASCAR even though its on the same weekend of the Pepsi (or whatever the new name will be) 400
  2. Becasue the other support race the Busch Series Winn-Dixie 250 has its own article anyway as we don't put both on the same page . By keeping Paul Revere 250 on the Pepsi 400 article it is creating a double standard.
  3. To keep the size of the Pepsi 400 article down and keep it within the 32 KB limit.

That is my reasons for the split proposial. I would like to hear comments below about this. Sawblade05 ( talk to me | my wiki life) 08:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply

  • I have no problem creating a new article for the Paul Revere 250. It started just as a sidenote section, but quickly grew out of hand when I unearthed a lot more information that I thought I'd ever find. I second the notion. Doctorindy ( talk) 14:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply
    • I have to say good job on that hopfully soon we can get it on its own article. That red link on the track page for Daytona been bugging me quite a bit and I have been wondering about this race also. Sawblade05 ( talk to me | my wiki life) 15:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply

The article is a train wreck

It's okay the Daytona 500 article is worse off as of now. I have decided to do a little research on the subject and hope to revert the article to a better rating. Hopefully, then we can expand in the right direction. ----   Jrobb525 23:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coke Zero 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Vandalism

User Huyandrew99 ( talk · contribs) / 72.220.189.39 ( talk · contribs) has repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing behavior of this article; pertaining to the current and future television rights holder of the Coke Zero 400 telecast. On multiple occasions, the editor has changed the article to state that the rights alternate between NBC and FOX, without sources, when it does not. Reliable sources make it clear that the NBC family of networks has exclusive rights to the second half of the NASCAR season (including Coke Zero 400) through the 2022 season. Discussion carried over to WP:NASCAR. DoctorindyTalk 02:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply