This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Church of Scientology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Church of Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Church of Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
sections about incidents of celeb endorsement should be added 216.164.249.213 ( talk) 04:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
This article is missing a section for "Service organizations". It should be placed before "Headquarters". Subsections should be:
Service orgs are the Church of Scientology organizations where public individuals ("members") go to get their services (auditing and training). It is the income-producing strata of the entire network. Grorp ( talk) 00:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Long texts under pictures can stretch the picture frame sideways, much broader than actual pictures, and in some cases so much that on some monitors almost no text can be flowed by it's side.
I have tested putting line breaks </br> on suitable places in those lines and because in preview it reclaimed the wasted monitor space, published them.
User: Grorp reverted one of those with comment
Revert caption changes. they looked good on a cell phone but awful on a computer web browser. long captions automatically wrap
It seems my solution was not suitable for every configuration, but at the same time it seems his remark is not true in all environments. I worked on comp screen; before my change (and after revert) in my case long captions didn't. (and don't) automatically revert. It seems the problem (no automatical varp for long captions), which I fudged by inserting newline tags, might be environment (e.g. browser, and maybe even version) dependant. I used and older version of firefox at the time.
And you (Grorp) seem to have been right: in Opera on the same comp long captions do seem to get automatically warped, so I am reverting my other recent patchy picture caption changes.
Marjan Tomki SI ( talk) 16:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
All of the sources mentioned in the "Works cited" section are not actually referenced in the article itself. I'm putting them here in case anyone needs to use or restore them. I'm leaving one, Lamont 1986, in "Further reading" because it is focused on the organization(s) and most closely matches the subject material.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 06:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)