This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • MrBeast Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:MrBeast |
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 April 2023. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The contents of the Chris Tyson page were merged into MrBeast on 22:44, 6 May 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
would it be enough for him to be considered notable, especially since there are so many news articles discussing the matter? 178.135.11.148 ( talk) 16:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
It's been reported that Tyson goes by any pronouns. Originally, this article was using he/him however I chose to change it because CNN and Insider have chosen to use they/them, and Variety has chosen to avoid pronouns. Haven't seen anything with he/him. While I don't think using he/him technically violates MOS:GENDERID, it still is best to use the pronouns that are both acceptable under GENDERID and are prevalent in reliable sources. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 05:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
I have a question. I am not being facetious, this is a real question intended to illicit a response. If Tyson doesn't care - why should we? What is to be accomplished by "correcting" an edit that, per the subject themselves, is not in error? Padillah ( talk) 14:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC) Padillah ( talk) 15:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC) |
If Tyson doesn't care - why should we?- Because Tyson doesn't own this article, and Tyson being satisfied is not the only parameter here. Tyson is satisfied with either he/him or they/them. Therefore, if you go by what satisfies Tyson you are left with a draw. That still leaves a question as to what pronouns should be used for this article. Using he/him may not be an error in the eye's of Tyson but it may not be what is best for this article, especially considering weight with reliable sources. Padillah, since you are the 3O responder, it would be appreciated if you could opine more directly on the dispute in that manner. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 03:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
As I mentioned at
WP:BLPN, per
MOS:GIDINFO the old photo (well video grab) from before Tyson started hormone therapy seems clearly inappropriate as the infobox photo. "Avoid using an out-of-date, pre-coming-out photo of a transgender subject as a lead image. If no other photos are available, it is generally better to have no lead image at all. In general, avoid using pre-coming-out photos unless the subject's pre-transition appearance is especially well-known and notable.
" While it's not clear how much Tyson cares about this particular issue, unless we have sources confirming they do not care it should not be primary photo. Potentially it could be part of the article somewhere else as part of discussion of Tyson's work on the MrBeast channel, but IMO given how short this article is there's no reason to include it anywhere at the moment. As for the infobox, it would probably be better to wait a few months and then look for a current photo.
Nil Einne (
talk) 04:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)