From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Potential inconsistency

Under 'Military cooperation' it says " Israel has now become China's second-largest supplier of arms (following Russia)." But under 'Controversies' it says "Israel's increasing defense cooperation with China has caused concern in the United States, which is the largest provider of military equipment to Israel."

I presume that the two statements can be reconciled; there is probably a difference in 'arms' and 'military equipment' that I'm not seeing. But it should be spelt out in the text. -- Matthew Proctor ( talk) 23:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply

  • China's top suppliers: 1. Russia, 2. Israel.
  • Israel's top suppliers: 1. United States...
There's a difference. Naur ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC). reply

Russia israel syria china quadrangle weapons dealing

Russia sells arms to syria, russia and israel jointly sold aircraft to china, and the chinese defense minister was able to visit Damascus and fly directly to israel after that, discussing military ties with both countries.

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/x238.html

Rajmaan ( talk) 04:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply

China, Iran, Israel anti soviet alliance

Cooley is a reliable source for china and israel's dealings in Afghanistan, although much of his attempts to deal with the history of islam in china is wrong. (he didn't know at all about the fact that the Second East Turkestan republic was a soviet puppet state)

http://books.google.com/books?id=J5C0R6qxjpgC&pg=PA54#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=J5C0R6qxjpgC&pg=PA56#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=YghqI97M56kC&pg=PA45#v=onepage&q&f=false



http://books.google.com/books?id=nhqRa0glD9oC&pg=PA117#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=nhqRa0glD9oC&pg=PA122#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=VqsXa70agc0C&pg=PT46#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=sdtH8lbzZqsC&pg=PA49#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=2HytCZn3j60C&pg=PA49#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=KxiKPeQyiakC&pg=PA58#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=pD6qyySpUAgC&pg=PA64#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=2XJyJLy-aYkC&pg=PA175#v=onepage&q&f=false

Israel supplied weapons to mujahideen

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_4-9-2005_pg1_7

http://www.ionglobaltrends.com/2005/09/books-pakistan-israel-supplied-arms-to.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20051103025506/http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Display_news.asp?section=World_News&subsection=Pakistan+%26+Sub%2DContinent&month=September2005&file=World_News200509052156.xml

http://books.google.com/books?id=nhqRa0glD9oC&pg=PA124#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan ( talk) 05:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on China–Israel relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Biased and Irrelevant Information

Under the development of bilateral relations, it reads "China's receptive and friendly embrace of the Jewish people on its soil has been one of affectionate sympathy as the Chinese have developed a favorable view of Jews, admiring them for their contributions to humanity, their ability to survive, the sharing of Chinese values such as family, frugality, hard work, and education, and being products of ancient civilizations have been an impetus towards the long and enduring friendship between the Chinese and Jewish peoples.[14][34][35] Shared affinities and similar cultural commonalities has not only been an impetus for the close bonds between China and Israel but has also created a symbol of brotherhood between the two communities.[13][36]" Not only is this information irrelevant to the section but reads like a ethnocentric propaganda with obvious favorable language to both sides.

I agree here. Not neutral and needs cleaning up. I think I'm going to be bold and take a stab at them. No one has disagreed with the above comment for a few days. so I think it's reasonable. 67.6.196.141 RedOak350 ( talk) 22:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Definitely sounds like someone copy-pasted a press release by their embassies. A cleanup would be appropriate. BrxBrx( talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 03:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC) reply