This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Celsius article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Measurement ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles Weather: General High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as High-importance).

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 19, 2013, May 19, 2014, May 19, 2017, May 19, 2018, May 19, 2021, and May 19, 2022.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Can someone explain the origin of the alternate spelling?

I note that the Oxford English dictionary now uses "Celsius", as do Americans and the man's name is "Celsius."

However, it was always "Celcius" when I was at school and University. I've checked with others and they recall being taught the alternate spelling. Perhaps "Celcius" is a better phonetic spelling for an english speaker?

Intriguing; never ran across that mistake(?) before myself. There are a lot of hits when you Google on it, too. Nothing in the Britannica or my other reference works. Must be another case of bloody American spelling.  :-)

Urhixidur 13:57, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC)

Enough of the gratuitous America-bashing. Back to your Google

         celcius site:.uk        13,800 hits
         celcius site:.au         7,450 hits

Gene Nygaard 05:51, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

There are some authors of books for schools and universities writing "Celcius", but I have found that my chemistry book for the university uses "Celsius". I think the last is the best way because of two reasons. First, it is fit with the English spelling. Then, it comes from the exact name of the Swedish scientist. Yves Revi 21:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC) reply

I think I've seen both too. However I think you've overlooked one obvious, important reason to prefer "Celsius", namely that it is the standard endorsed by the BIPM: see [1] or [2] (Incidentally, the latter clearly explains why Celsius is capitalised).

— DIV ( 128.250.204.118 08:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)) reply

I'm an American and all books I've ever used here spell it as Celsius. Dave

Just noting that the OED doesn't record Celcius at all, not even as a variant. Does anyone have a citation for a reference work with the -c- spelling? 88.19.0.37 ( talk) 13:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Part of the infobox to the right →

Infobox at the moment confuses two different notions of "1 degree Celsius". a) the point just above freezing temperature of water and b) difference between, say, 29°C and 30°C. I.e. it confuses an absolute point on centigrade scale, and a relative difference between two points. Template:Infobox unit at the moment is more tailored towards conversions of relative quantities. In the infobox, the formulas in the right column are OK. It is the 1 in the left column that is the issue. Maybe it would be better to split it from the infobox, and add conversion formulas in a separate box? Something like:

—⁠ andrybak ( talk) 14:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Looked a bit into Template:Infobox unit, and after a small tweak, I went ahead, and changed infobox, to make it about absolute temperatures only. —⁠ andrybak ( talk) 14:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect °С. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 10:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Shouldn't most of the evolution of the definition of celsius be in the history section. People coming to this page expect the lede paragraphs to give an overview of what the thing is, not multiple definitions over several paragraphs which give conflicting descriptions. — Memotype:: T 00:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC) reply

I've made edits with various wordings, three-times reversed, to indicate that Kelvin has a relationship with Celsius; it's not simply another scale. Historically Kelvin is derived from Celsius; in modern times obviously Celsius is defined in terms of Kelvin. I don't agree that the previous wording is entirely adequate.

I think we can put something in the opening para, perhaps "with same size intervals" or perhaps even just "related scale Kelvin".

First below is how it was; 2 and 3 are two of my wordings.

1. Most countries use this scale; the other major scale, Fahrenheit, is still used in the United States, some island territories, and Liberia. The Kelvin scale is of use in the sciences, with 0 K (−273.15 °C) representing absolute zero.
2. ... The Kelvin scale is of use in the sciences, and was originally derived from Celsius, but with 0 K (−273.15 °C) representing absolute zero.
3. ... The Kelvin scale is of use in the sciences, and is based on Celsius but shifted by -273.15 so that 0 K is absolute zero.

My last edit was to add "closely-related" to "[...] one of two temperature scales used in the International System of Units (SI), the other being the closely-related Kelvin scale." This is in my opinion the best compromise between brevity and informative.

What do others think?

88.19.0.37 ( talk) 13:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I think it's worth mentioning in the lead. Kelvin is already brought up in the first paragraph, so it's a logical place to put this information. Justin Kunimune ( talk) 12:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply

At present we mention the Kelvin scale in the first sentence of the lead, describe it in the last sentence of the first paragraph, repeat that description in the second half of the third paragraph with more details, and then focus the fourth paragraph on the Kelvin scale too.

The mention at the end of the first paragraph is only forced on us by the preceding description of Fahrenheit as "the other major scale", as that seems contrary to Kelvin's place in science. Let's change

Most countries use this scale; the other major scale, Fahrenheit, is still used in the United States, some island territories, and Liberia. The Kelvin scale is of use in the sciences, with 0 K (−273.15 °C) representing absolute zero

to

Most countries use this scale (the Fahrenheit scale is still used in the United States, some island territories, and Liberia).

Together with that, we could implement the IP's third, briefest suggestion and change the end of the first sentence from

the other being the Kelvin scale.

to

the other being the closely related Kelvin scale.

without further overwhelming the lead of this article, Celsius. NebY ( talk) 13:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply