| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Why is this page allowed to exist on WikiP? There are no sources given, although the facts seem to be solid. I think it was written by the cathedral public-relations machine itself.
Shouldn't we just delete it until the people who wrote it put in their sources?
Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis 06:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Like many pages, this article was written before we became as concerned about having every sentence. It would be inappropriate to toss out the article just because the sources which were undoubtedly consulted to write are not listed. If there are any particular facts which you think should be sourced then the current practice is to add the {fact} template. - Will Beback 07:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
The church was featured on October 25th, 2006's episode of South Park. Just noting incase there ever is a "trivia" section about this famous cathedral.-- Freepablo 02:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- It is Wikipedia policy to discourage trivia sections, but the fact could be integrated into a beefed up "Popular culture" section. -- Gerald Farinas ( talk) 03:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
According to the article, she is actually burried at the cathedral. Is this true? Or is it just some relics relating to her? -- Ragemanchoo ( talk) 07:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I have contributed to this article and have footnoted my work (#3 and #5) and I will continue to do so. To suggest the article was "written by the cathedral public-relations machine itself" is not only ludicrous (go read my contributions) but sadly, it smacks of anti-Catholic bigotry.
Yes the earthly remains of Saint Vibiana are located in the sarcophagus in the St. Vibiana chapel at the cathedral. Dataproducts ( talk) 20:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
|
An image used in this article, File:The Virgin Mary by Robert Graham.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:The Virgin Mary by Robert Graham.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 19:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC) |
The text says "The cathedral is named in honor of the Blessed Virgin Mary under the patronal title of Our Lady of the Angels, echoing the full name of the original settlement of Los Angeles (Spanish: El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles, or "The Town of Our Lady the Queen of the Angels")." The word "Queen" does not appear in the footnote, and the article History of Los Angeles says "The name first given to the settlement is debated. Historian Doyce P. Nunis has said that the Spanish named it "El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles" ("The Town of the Queen of the Angels"). For proof, he pointed to a map dated 1785, where that phrase was used. Frank Weber, the diocesan archivist, replied, however, that the name given by the founders was "El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora de los Angeles de Porciuncula", or "the town of Our Lady of the Angels of Porciuncula." and that the map was in error" Why does this article contradict what the diocesan archivist himself said? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 11:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels (Los Angeles). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012205719/http://www.cathedralsofcalifornia.com/ to http://www.cathedralsofcalifornia.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels (Los Angeles). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111213235734/http://www.rvosko.com/pages/projectdetail.asp?projectID=46 to http://www.rvosko.com/pages/projectdetail.asp?projectID=46
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Is this category appropriate? It should be considered that the cathedral parish is an entity that has existed for much longer than that. The site has changed, perhaps the parochial territory is different, but there was continuity with archbishop, a stable community, etc. Elizium23 ( talk) 03:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Start-Class Los Angeles articles
- Mid-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- Start-Class Southern California articles
- Unknown-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles