This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Amtrak Capitol Corridor. |
This article conflicts with the Pacific Surfliner article in its first paragraph because it claims the Capitol Corridor is the third-busiest Amtrak route after the Northeast Corridor and the Pacific Surfliner.
However, the Pacific Surfliner article claims in its lead paragraph that it, also, is the third busiest route, behind the Northeast Corridor and the Keystone Service.
I'll try to do some research to find out the true ranking, and then I reckon I'll try my first significant edit as a Wikipedian. :-)
Anyway, this is also me trying out the talk page. Hope everyone is well! Comodude 01:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a schedule right in front of me that says the length of th eline is only 170 miles, not the longer distance stated in the article. That seems more reasonable for San Jose to Auburn anyway--does anyone know the reason for the discrepancy? -- SCZenz 20:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't think listing bus agencies that serve the different stops is in the best interest of the article, if we were to do that we would have to add AC transit to Fremont, and Coliseum, and VTA to Diridon, as well as likely several more changes, I added BART and Caltrain connections because I figured they were notable. I don't think AC transit connection is notable and I suggest we remove it. -- JVittes 09:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Capitollogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
No mention is made of the speed of the trains on this line. 71.139.18.11 17:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Capitol Corridor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Using the Hiawatha Service tables as a template, I have not been able to integrate these into this article without breaking the formatting of subsequent sections. any help getting these placed herein would be appreciated. - MJ ( talk) 20:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Fiscal Year | Ridership | %± | Ticket Revenue | %± | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 1,450,069 | – | $18,059,715 | – | [1] |
2008 | 1,693,580 | 16.79% | $22,306,774 | 23.52% | [1] |
2009 | 1,599,625 | 6.55% | $22,160,890 | 0.65% | [1] |
2010 | 1,580,619 | 1.19% | $22,872,085 | 3.21% | [2] |
2011 | 1,708,618 | 8.1% | $25,720,252 | [2] | |
2012 | 1,746,397 | 2.21% | $27,927,540 | [3] | |
2013 | 1,460,455 | 16.37% | $27,699,783 | [4] [note 1] | |
2014 | 1,419,134 | 2.83% | $27,105,046 | 2.15% | [4] |
2015 | 1,474,873 | 3.93% | [5] | ||
2016 | 1,560,814 | 5.83% | [5] | ||
2017 | 1,607,000 | 2.96% | [6] | ||
2018 | 1,706,849 | 6.21% | [7] | ||
2019 | 1,777,136 | 4.12% | [7] | ||
2020 | 898,007 | 49.47% | – | [8] | |
2021 | 354,373 | 61.54% | [9] |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
References
Cite error: There are <ref group=note>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}}
template (see the
help page).