This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California Institute of Technology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles This article was a past Collaboration of the Month. California: Los Angeles / Southern California Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below]

• The name of the current chair of the Board of Directors needs to be updated. :
• The previous chair, David Lee, has stepped down, and the new chair is David Thompson.:
• https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/david-lee-steps-down-as-chair-of-the-board-of-trustees:

Abenter ( talk) 23:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for making this request. This information seems to be unnecessary in the article so I've just removed it entirely. ElKevbo ( talk) 01:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Curious whether trustee Charles W. Gates mentioned under History, Throop College, is the same Charles W. Gates with a Wikipedia article. Looks doubtful geographically and nobody else has linked it. The Gates (surname) is widespread. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CD89:8710:359A:408:9444:BA15 ( talk) 22:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC) reply

It is a different person, Charles Warner Gates (not Charles Winslow Gates) [1]. Antony–22 ( ^talk⁄ _contribs) 02:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC) reply

There is an RfC going on on whether the names the South Houses and North Houses at Caltech should be capitalized. The question is whether these names are proper nouns, and whether the amount of sources capitalizing them is a "substantial majority". Your comments and !votes are appreciated. Antony–22 ( ^talk⁄ _contribs) 03:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC) reply

After doing some research, I agree with ElKevbo that general mention of university prestige should be removed from the introduction of Wikipedia articles. Caltech's small size, however, speaks to its selectivity for which it's well-known. It's a feature of the research institution (not necessarily the university at the undergraduate level) and underlines all the institutional proceedings at Caltech per the article. I think this, at the very least, should remain. BorderlineRebel ( talk) 14:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I haven't argued that "general mention of university prestige should be removed from the introduction of Wikipedia articles." In alignment with current consensus, I object to the inclusion of material that makes claims of prestige based only on a Wikipedia editor's interpretation of ephemeral sources, particularly when this is a topic that is so well studied and documented by scholars and experts. ElKevbo ( talk) 22:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC) reply

ElKevbo I apologize for my misunderstanding. Check the page now. I'm really trying to give good information without suggesting prestige. The current intro doesn't suggest this. Let me know what you think! BorderlineRebel ( talk) 01:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Would San Andreas (film) count in any way? 149.20.252.132 ( talk) 14:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

How about Mission Impossible (the TV series) and the steam tunnels? Does that merit mention? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigMac31 ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply

My apologies for a few seconds of erroneous changes, all reverted back. Please feel free to delete any track of the changes. K Kalan ( talk) 02:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC) reply