This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bund Bull article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Bund Bull was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 21, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Arturo Di Modica's
Bund Bull was modelled after both
Wall Street's
Charging Bull and the
Chinese zodiac's
Ox? |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in China may be able to help! |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bund Bull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
"The Bull's popularity has been a problem for local authorities."
No source for this, and it is not mentioned in the rest of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.93.74 ( talk) 22:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
"actually it is 17.1-foot (5.2 m) long and 10.5-foot (3.2 m) tall." There doesn't seem to be a source for this, and it contradicts the (sourced) size quoted later in the article: "At 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) tall, 3.3 metres (11 ft) long and 2.5 tonnes (2.7 tons)" 180.150.63.179 ( talk) 02:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)