This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A news item involving Bulgaria (ship) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 12 July 2011. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 10, 2018. |
This paragraph doesn't make sense:
The sinking of Bulgaria is the largest non-military ship disaster in the history of the Russian Federation. Taking Soviet civilian ship disasters into account, the larger loss of life last occurred in 1986 when SS Admiral Nakhimov crashed into a cargo ship.
According to its Wikipedia article, Nakhimov was also a civilian ship at the time of the accident. So that would be the largest civilian ship disaster, yet the first sentenced quoted here says Bulgaria is the largest civilian ship disaster. "Non-military" means "civilian." I can't clean this up because the reference is in Russian. — Diiscool ( talk) 16:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
http://www.mchs.gov.ru/eng/hotline/detail.php?ID=423261 is supposed to work, but it 404s...
On the main English page ( http://www.mchs.gov.ru/eng/ http://www.webcitation.org/607IDzCCd) the accompanying text says "Telephone "hotline" for updating current situation and lists of rescued and injured during the wreck of the MV "Bulgaria" - 8 (843) 227-46-56"
The Russian homepage ( http://www.mchs.gov.ru/ http://www.webcitation.org/607Hyyhcd) has a link that works Text is "Телефон "горячей линии" для уточнения текущей обстановки и списков спасенных и пострадавших при аварии теплохода "Булгария" - 8 (843) 227-46-56" WhisperToMe ( talk) 06:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Was the Soviet Union name "Ukraina" or "Ukraine". The infobox does not match information in article.-- EdwardZhao ( talk) 12:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
A lot of confusion over numbers even after couple of days since the sinking. Since some (estimated at 25 by EMERCOM) passengers were "unregistered" i.e. did not buy a cruise ticket (and became uninsured, by the way) the total number is not really yet known. As well, some who bought a ticket did not actually use it. There's also a lot of conflicting claims in regards to total rated capacity of the boat (as 233 which is stated in the infobox is not correct. Capacity was rated down at some point, due to a rebuild or tougher regulations, for instance). EMERCOM website states capacity at 140, most likely implying passenger number only (but not specifically stating so). Number of all persons aboard before the disaster varies from 195 to 209, so the final number is still to be officially confirmed. Senseiich ( talk) 22:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Also some useful links in Russian with some detailed info, from respectable sources. Events timeline; Tatarstan branch of EMERCOM which publishes updates on passenger and crew members list etc. Senseiich ( talk) 22:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi there! 273 kilowatts is not enough power for 11,1 knots in a ship of this size. I assume, each engine has 273 kW. Brgds, -- SteKrueBe ( talk) 01:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 20 external links on Bulgaria (ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://j-new-company.ru/Tula-7.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mchs.gov.ru/eng/emergency/detail.php?ID=424231&When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)