This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bandwidth throttling is a huge issue right now for consumers and a lot of ISPs are doing it by restricting applications and limiting bandwidth for others, such as bittorrent traffic. If anyone has any information on whether Bright House does it or not, it should be posted. My personal experience is that it appears that Bright House may be doing it (in comparison to my use of Comcast and other ISPs), but I don't have solid info. Jamie 20:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
File:Bright house.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I see that the ref page says 100 employees, which I think is wrong, I see their fleet of trucks ALL the time, the numbers on their truck's range from 1-450(highest I have seen), how do they have a huge fleet? and 100 employees, we need better research on the employee number. AntiVanMan ( talk) 01:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
On Monday, June 23, 2008, Bright House discontinued their newsgroup service. Worth a mention? 72.189.248.245 ( talk) 15:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Not really because they had been using newshosting for a while anyway. On June the 23 their use of newshosting just became a lot more explicit. 97.96.59.27 ( talk) 23:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
To clarify this issue, Bright House Networks continues to provide their Road Runner customers with newsgroup access at no additional charge through Newshosting.com right here http://www.newshosting.com/bhn-en/. 70.126.196.118 ( talk) 23:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)BHN Insider
well Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable seems to be facing a possible carriage disputer with the News Corporation owned cable networks and TV stations. this will start on January 1, 2010. in fact Fox has started a campaign to demand there viewers to make Time Warner Cable & Bright House Networks not pull the News Corporation Cable channels and FOX and MyNetworkTV O&O Stations off of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks. in fact here's that site: http://www.keepfoxon.com-- Boutitbenza 69 9 ( talk) 21:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
More sources: Orlando Sentinel post Jerr ( talk) 00:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
We say
> All of the systems now owned by Bright House were owned by the Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership but, under a deal struck in 2003, Advance/Newhouse took direct management and operational responsibility for portion of the partnership cable systems roughly equal to their equity.
But that's not quite accurate. A friend of mine -- I'm trying to figure out a suitable way to source this -- was employed by them all the way back to when they were Vision Cable, competing with Paragon in Pinellas County, FL, and tells me her paychecks have *always* said "Advance/Newhouse Cable Partnership", whether the branding was VC, TW or BH.
--
Baylink (
talk) 03:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I regret the removal of two sections from the article. User talk:BHNtechXpert forgot to add references to the dispute section and has since been removed with respect to WP:NEUTRAL. Fairly OddParents Freak ( Fairlyoddparents1234) 23:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm not an experienced Wikipedian, but I feel like the "Awards and Recognition" section needs to go. It's an advertisement. It doesn't cite any sources, it's got a skewed POV, and it doesn't contribute anything meaningful to the article. Would I be violating any rules of etiquette if I just gave it the axe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.10.250.11 ( talk) 06:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
[ I see I've already addressed this above on a different point. Sorry ]
> and the Tampa Bay/Orlando Time Warner Communications (previously Time Inc.'s American Television & Communications before the Time Warner merger) systems in Florida.
{ { citation-needed } }
With the exception of the Paragon homes Bright House picked up in St Petersburg, all the Bright House customers in Pinellas County FL were always customers of Advance/Newhouse, which has owned the major primary cable company in the county since before I moved here in 1981. Vision Cable, then Time Warner, through a marketing agreement tied to the usage of the Road Runner trademark, and now Bright House; I've known people who've been employees in all three regimes, and all tell me their paychecks have been made out by "Advance/Newhouse Cable Partnership", for the entire 35 years. So I have to assume the quoted graf above is inaccurate. I don't have a quotable cite, but I don't see one on that either. So unless someone can provide one, I'm going to take it out.
--
Baylink (
talk) 00:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This article was moved from Bright House Networks to Bright House Networks Spectrum, but I have reverted the move - for identical reasons as spelled out at Talk:Time Warner Cable#Page name. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 00:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)