From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

Article is a near-verbatim lift from www.breakspark.com. — Dishwasherrat 00:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | ( Talk) reply

Where does this park enter Kentucky? -- NE2 17:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) reply

The Russell Fork gorge is not the deepest gorge east of the Mississippi nor is Little River Canyon in Alabama. There are deeper gorges in the south and east of the Mississippi. One example would be the Nolichucky Gorge in NC and TN; it drops over 2000 vertical feet in places. In addition, Linville Gorge, also in NC, drops nearly 2000 vertical feet from the top rim to the river.

What kind of park?

Calling this an "Interstate" park obscures the kind of park this is. No indication that this is a National Park Service park, or a Kentucky state park, or a Virginia state park, or even a privately owned park. Perhaps I made a hasty reading of the linked website, but Wikipedia should tell us more.-- DThomsen8 ( talk) 00:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC) reply

This is an interstate park because it lies within both Virginia and Kentucky. As far as I know, it is one of only two interstate parks in the U.S. It is not a national park. Both Virginia and Kentucky equally support this park. "Breaks Interstate Park" is the offical title of this park. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deel k ( talkcontribs) 12:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Changes Reverted

I reverted the removal of "Grand Canyon of the South", because whether or not it was invented by a tourism board, it's called that in reliable sources: [1]. I also reverted the removal of the claim that it's the deepest gorge with the argument that Little River Canyon is deeper, because the WP article on it says it's 600 feet deep (and so does this source: [2]), while Breaks is over 1600 feet according to [3] and [4]. SheepNotGoats ( talk) 15:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Breaks Interstate Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply