This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disambiguation This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles LGBT studies This disambiguation page is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

The edit comment discussions are so much more fun, but tragically I don't have an edit to go with my comment this time. To answer User:Marshman's query: when I say that "hermaphroditic" and "androgynous" are still used as synonyms for "bisexual" in botanical terminology I'm basing this on fairly technical, recently published books I have perused that use these terms, as well as widespread use on the WWW. Botanical use of hermaphrodite is also supported be MerWeb. MerWeb also basically indicates that bisexual, hermaphrodite, and androgynous are generally synonymous (including allowing "hemaphrodite" as an adjective :p). I said "popular" use because you suggested they are no longer preferred by professional botanists; I wouldn't know; MerWeb is not a very technical source. -- Chinasaur 01:05, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Surely this should be at Bisexual (disambiguation), as bisexuality is a much more frequent use of the term. Also, the third bullet point (including the point about bonobo monkeys), isn't a separate term, merely a paragraph that should be added to the article bisexuality, surely? — OwenBlacker 23:48, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. I am going to go ahead and move it, it has no sense being here. -- Waterspyder 20:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC) reply

I agree. Moving it now. -- OliverL 10:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) reply