This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ben Carson 2016 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
That section reads like an apologetic, non-encyclopedic mess. Tagged accordingly. - Cwobeel (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
This material should be retained for historical background. 50.174.200.16 ( talk) 19:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry I based my revert(s) on the unsourced statement that West Point has not had an impact, especially considering the continuing news headlines today about the topic. I desist. 50.174.200.16 ( talk) 20:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/two-of-carsons-top-aides-resign-217261#ixzz3vw8umncI
According to the Green Papers, Carson placed 5th among Republicans during the primary with 857,039 votes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.38.14 ( talk) 03:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ben Carson presidential campaign, 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)