This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a part of a project to assess school articles that were unassessed, I have assessed this article for the Schools Project.
I am assessing this article's importance as "Low", but this is a provisional assessment. There are several extraordinary claims made in this article. Without having more in depth knowledge of the history of schools in China, I cannot tell how many of these claims were particularly unique to this school, or happened to many schools in China (especially in regards to post-WWII history). Certainly, being the only school shown off to IOC members shows how high a regard the government holds the school.
Unfortunately, there are no reliable sources cited in the article. This makes it impossible to verify these claims. I strongly hope that editors will seek out reliable, third party sources that can confirm these claims and include them in the article. It is possible that this school is deserving of a much higher importance rating, but I cannot give it without proper referencing.
I am also rating the article a "C" class article. It is impossible for this article to be rated any higher without proper referencing. There was also a problem with some obvious language that did not conform to the neutral point of view policy. I believe I have cleaned most of this up, but I might have missed some.
I wish editors great luck in improving this article. I think this school has an interesting story to tell that will be of interest far beyond China. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 16:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I am copying this from my (LonelyBeacon's) talk page:
Hi, I noticed that you have assessed this article and rated it as Low-importance. Well, I do believe that this school deserves a much higher importance rating. Many people in China (including students from its competitors, e.g., the school that I currently go to) regard Beijing No.4 High School as the best high school in China. And it's the only high school listed on the English version of the Government of Xicheng District, Beijing Website despite the fact that there are many notable high schools in the district.
I have read your suggestions on the talk page and I have added some reliable, third-party references to both the en and zh version of the article.
The problem is, many pre-PRC period facts can't be verified since no third-party source can be found on the Internet (searched in both English and Chinese). So my question is, is using information from the official Beijing No.4 School Alumni Association Website as references acceptable on enwiki? It's not a third-party source, but it's official. On zhwiki, official sources are acceptable (though not recommended). I'm not familiar with enwiki policies and guidelines and I can't find anything mentioning official sources in the corresponding enwiki guideline page Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources.
If official sources are acceptable on enwiki, I'll be able to add more references and maybe I can ask for a re-assess.
-- t m yan OMG 02:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Beijing No. 4 High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.numbertheory.org/obituaries/OTHERS/chen/page225.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.80edu.com/html/xiaoxue/bjxsc/bjzdzx/17302.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
There are three figures of the size of school grounds, all different...The only one sourced is from an 1986 paper by the designer... Meng Yibai ( talk) 17:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)